The thing I'm most interested in is the nervous system. How do brains grow? How do genes build complicated nervous systems?
Sydney BrennerRead
People have always asked whether evolution is constantly driving onwards and upwards. Is there always going to be improvement? The answer is no: evolution is a progression of form and function, but it is not purposeful.
Interpretation
Evolution is not a linear process aimed at improvement; it is a series of changes without a specific purpose.
Sydney Brenner's quote emphasizes that evolution does not follow a defined trajectory towards improvement or complexity. Instead, it is a natural progression influenced by environmental factors, where forms and functions adapt without a predetermined goal, highlighting the randomness and unpredictability inherent in the evolutionary process.
In practice
In a discussion about the nature of progress in biological systems.
The thing I'm most interested in is the nervous system. How do brains grow? How do genes build complicated nervous systems?
The moment I saw the model and heard about the complementing base pairs I realized that it was the key to understanding all the problems in biology we had found intractable - it was the birth of molecular biology.
The art of doing science is doing the important things first.
As was predicted at the beginning of the Human Genome Project, getting the sequence will be the easy part as only technical issues are involved. The hard part will be finding out what it means, because this poses intellectual problems of how to understand the participation of the genes in the functions of living cells.
It is now widely realized that nearly all the 'classical' problems of molecular biology have either been solved or will be solved in the next decade. The entry of large numbers of American and other biochemists into the field will ensure that all the chemical details of replication and transcription will be elucidated. Because of this, I have long felt that the future of molecular biology lies in the extension of research to other fields of biology, notably development and the nervous system.
The slow rejection of the foreign skin grafts fascinated me. How could the host distinguish another person's skin from his own?
Although this may seem a paradox, all exact science is dominated by the idea of approximation. When a man tells you that he knows the exact truth about anything, you are safe in inferring that he is an inexact man. Every careful measurement in science is always given with the probable error ... every observer admits that he is likely wrong, and knows about how much wrong he is likely to be.
Now I know what the atom looks like.
I can never satisfy myself until I can make a mechanical model of a thing. If I can make a mechanical model, I can understand it. As long as I cannot make a mechanical model all the way through I cannot understand.
You can prove anything you want by coldly logical reason---if you pick the proper postulates.
I believe there are no questions that science can't answer about a physical universe.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.