A god implants in mortal guilt whenever he wants utterly to confound a house.
AeschylusRead
ATHENA: You wish to be called righteous rather than act right. [...] I say, wrong must not win by technicalities.
Interpretation
The quote emphasizes the importance of genuine righteousness over mere appearances or technicalities in ethical behavior.
In this quote, Athena asserts that true righteousness is about acting in accordance with moral principles rather than merely seeking the title or label of being righteous. It suggests that ethical behavior should be the priority, as wrongful actions should not be allowed to succeed simply due to clever arguments or loopholes, thus urging people to focus on integrity and moral clarity in their decisions.
In practice
This quote could be used in a discussion about ethical decision-making in business.
A god implants in mortal guilt whenever he wants utterly to confound a house.
Neither a life of anarchy nor a life under a despot should you praise. To all that lies in the middle has a god given excellence.
In every tyrant's heart there springs in the end this poison, that he cannot trust a friend.
It is not the oath that makes us believe the man, but the man the oath.
In war, truth is the first casualty.
There is no pain so great as the memory of joy in present grief.
Let no man be sorry he has done good, because others concerned with him have done evil! If a man has acted right, he has done well, though along; if wrong, the sanction of all mankind will not justify him.
A designer God cannot be used to explain organized complexity because any God capable of designing anything would have to be complex enough to demand the same kind of explanation in his own right.
Pragmatism asks its usual question. "Grant an idea or belief to be true," it says, "what concrete difference will its being true make in anyone's actual life? How will the truth be realized? What experiences will be different from those which would obtain if the belief were false? What, in short, is the truth's cash-value in experiential terms?
I found earthquakes, even when I was in them, deeply satisfying, abruptly revealed evidence of the scheme in action. That the schemes could destroy the works of man might be a personal regret but remained, in the larger picture I had come to recognize, a matter of abiding indifference. No eye was on the sparrow. No eye was watching me.
There isn't any fear in existence itself, or any uncertainty, but living creates it.
To make an omelette, you need not only those broken eggs but someone 'oppressed' to beat them: every revolutionist is presumed to understand that, and also every woman, which either does or does not make 51 percent of the population of the United States a potentially revolutionary class.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.