Cancer cells have had so many other things go wrong with them, genetic, non-genetic changes, that those cells, one of the things they then get selected for is that they have lots of telomerase because now the telomeres in those cells get maintained.
Challenges in medicine are moving from 'Treat the symptoms after the house is on fire' to 'Can we preserve the house intact?'
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote emphasizes the shift in medicine from treating illnesses after they occur to preventing them altogether.
Elizabeth Blackburn's quote reflects a transformative approach in the field of medicine where the focus is shifting from reactive treatments—addressing health issues only after they become apparent—to proactive strategies aimed at health preservation and disease prevention. This metaphor of the house burning down illustrates the importance of maintaining health before it deteriorates, thereby emphasizing the need for a preventive mindset in healthcare.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
This quote can be used in a healthcare seminar to emphasize the importance of preventive medicine.
More from Elizabeth Blackburn
All quotes →We and other groups are seeing clear statistical links between telomere shortness and risk for a variety of diseases that are becoming very common, such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes and certain cancers.
Checking your telomere length is a bit like weighing yourself: you get this single number which depends on a lot of factors. Telomere length gives a sense of your underlying health.
We think there are lifestyle factors that boost telomerase naturally.
For me, arguably the story of telomeres and telomerase began thousands of years ago, in the cornfields of the Maya highlands of Central America.
If we think of our chromosomes - they carry our genetic material - as being like shoelaces, I work on the plastic tips at the end that protect them.
Similar quotes
Certainly, it may bring to light such a deeper knowledge of the structure of matter as to constitute a veritable discontinuity in the progress of science.
Science is not a substitute for common sense, but an extension of it.
It is in our genes to understand the universe if we can, to keep trying even if we cannot, and to be enchanted by the act of learning all the way.
No one may have the guts to say this, but if we could make better human beings by knowing how to add genes, why shouldn't we?
To demonstrate experimentally that a microscopic organism actually is the cause of a disease and the agent of contagion, I know no other way, in the present state of Science, than to subject the microbe (the new and happy term introduced by M. Sédillot) to the method of cultivation out of the body.
My dear Kepler, what would you say of the learned here, who, replete with the pertinacity of the asp, have steadfastly refused to cast a glance through the telescope? What shall we make of this? Shall we laugh, or shall we cry?