Children live in the same world we do. To kid ourselves that we can shelter them from it isn't just naive it's a vanity.
Interpretation
Children are part of the same reality as adults, and trying to shield them from it is both unrealistic and self-serving.
In this quote, Lionel Shriver emphasizes the importance of acknowledging the shared reality between children and adults. Rather than attempting to shelter children from the complexities and challenges of the world, which can be seen as a form of vanity and naivety, we should prepare them to navigate it. This perspective advocates for honest communication and the gradual introduction of children to the world's realities, fostering resilience and understanding.
In practice
This quote could be used in a seminar about parenting and childhood education.
Yet if there's no reason to live without a child, how could there be with one? To answer one life with a successive life is simply to transfer the onus of purpose to the next generation; the displacements amounts to a cowardly and potentially infinite delay. Your children's answer, presumably, will be to procreate as well, and in doing so to distract themselves, to foist their own aimlessness onto their offspring.
For pity's sake, if you don't take a shine to a novel, there are loads more in the world; read something else. Continue suffering, and it's not the author's fault. It's yours.
In my country, we're sufficiently consumed by the concept of happiness that the right to its pursuit is enshrined in the Declaration of Independence. But what is happiness?
You were always uncomfortable with the rhetoric of emotion, which is quite a different matter from discomfort with emotion itself.
In the big picture I write for an audience of people I've never met. By the final draft I'm looking for anything in the prose that's prospectively boring to strangers.
Not that happiness is dull. Only that it doesn't tell well. And of our consuming diversions as we age is to recite, not only to others but to ourselves, our own story.
Education without social action is a one-sided value because it has no true power potential.
For me, literacy means freedom. For the individual and for society.
In a sense, the better you adapt to school the less your chances are of later adapting to the actual world. So I figure, the worse you adapt to school, the better you will be able to handle reality when you finally manage to get loose at last from school, if that ever happens. But I guess I have what in the military they call a 'poor attitude,' which means 'shape up or ship out.' I always elected to ship out.
It's not that our high school system was not designed well, but that it was designed in 1906 when the country was just out of the industrial era. There hasn't been a substantial systemic change the way we do high school since then.
We have an obligation to read aloud to our children. To read them things they enjoy. To read to them stories we are already tired of. To do the voices, to make it interesting, and not to stop reading to them just because they learn to read to themselves. Use reading-aloud time as bonding time, as time when no phones are being checked, when the distractions of the world are put aside.
A teacher who is not dogmatic is simply a teacher who is not teaching.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.