There is no plausible theory under which the record of the Pentagon Papers can be interpreted as relating to the national defense.
Congressional Republicans are dismantling the limited environmental protections initiated by Richard Nixon, who would be something of a dangerous radical in today's political scene.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote highlights the irony of political shifts in environmental policies over the decades, suggesting that what was once considered moderate is now seen as radical.
Noam Chomsky's quote points out the significant changes in political perspectives regarding environmental protections. He illustrates how the actions of Congressional Republicans to roll back protections, originally established by Richard Nixon, reflect a profound shift in political ideology; Nixonβs moderate stance on environmental issues would likely be viewed as extreme in the current political climate. This commentary invites reflection on how governance and societal values evolve over time, particularly in the realm of environmentalism.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a discussion about environmental policy changes in a political debate.
More from Noam Chomsky
All quotes βThe 'free-floating intellectual' may occupy himself with problems because of their inherent interest and importance, perhaps to little effect.
If you're teaching today what you were teaching five years ago, either the field is dead or you are.
There are very few people who are going to look into the mirror and say, 'That person I see is a savage monster;' instead, they make up some construction that justifies what they do.
The Republican Party has become overwhelmingly so extreme that it's hardly a traditional political party anymore.
There is still much debate about whether torture has been effective in eliciting information - the assumption being, apparently, that if it is effective, then it may be justified.
Similar quotes
A politician, he knows that the majority cares little for ideals or integrity. What it craves is display.
The necessity of a senate is not less indicated by the propensity of all single and numerous assemblies, to yield to the impulse of sudden and violent passions, and to be seduced by factious leaders, into intemperate and pernicious resolutions.
That no government, so called, can reasonably be trusted, or reasonably be supposed to have honest purposes in view, any longer than it depends wholly upon voluntary support.
Who do you think controls the Republican Party? Big money controls the Republican Party. This is where their campaign contributions come from.
Any country is either becoming more democratic or less democratic. I think the United States hasn't tended to its journey toward democracy in a long time.
May our country be always successful, but whether successful or otherwise, always right.