There is no plausible theory under which the record of the Pentagon Papers can be interpreted as relating to the national defense.
A consistent anarchist must oppose private ownership of the means of production, and the wage-slavery which is a component of this system, as incompatible with the principle that labor must be freely undertaken and under the control of the producer.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote highlights the conflict between private ownership in capitalism and the idea of freely chosen labor.
In this quote, Noam Chomsky argues that true anarchism entails rejecting private ownership of production because it leads to wage slavery, which contradicts the fundamental anarchist principle that labor should be voluntary and controlled by those who produce. Chomsky emphasizes that for anarchy to be realized, labor must not be coerced or exploited but rather freely undertaken by individuals who have autonomy over their work and its outcomes.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
During a lecture on economic systems, one could use this quote to illustrate the disparity between anarchist ideals and capitalist practices.
More from Noam Chomsky
All quotes βThe 'free-floating intellectual' may occupy himself with problems because of their inherent interest and importance, perhaps to little effect.
If you're teaching today what you were teaching five years ago, either the field is dead or you are.
There are very few people who are going to look into the mirror and say, 'That person I see is a savage monster;' instead, they make up some construction that justifies what they do.
The Republican Party has become overwhelmingly so extreme that it's hardly a traditional political party anymore.
There is still much debate about whether torture has been effective in eliciting information - the assumption being, apparently, that if it is effective, then it may be justified.
Similar quotes
If every man took only what was sufficient for his needs, leaving the rest to those in want, there would be no rich and no poor.
In the alluvial sweep of the land, I thought I could see the past and the present and the future all at once, as though time were not sequential in nature but took place without a beginning or an end, like a flash of green light rippling outward from the center of creation, not unlike a dream inside the mind of God.
We live in worlds that we have forged and composed. It's much more true than any of the species that you see. I mean, it seems to me that one of the most distinctive features of human intelligence is the capacity to imagine, to project out of our own immediate circumstances and to bring to mind things that aren't present here and now.
You Christians look after a document containing enough dynamite to blow all civilisation to pieces, turn the world upside down and bring peace to a battle-torn planet. But you treat it as though it is nothing more than a piece of literature.
I'm not an optimist. I'm a realist. And my reality is that we live in a multifaceted, multicultural world. And maybe once we stop labeling ourselves, then maybe everyone else will.
Sometimes one feels that it would be merciful to tear down these houses, for they must often dream.