The decentralized nature of online conversations often makes it easier to manipulate public opinion, both domestically and globally. Regimes that once relied on centralized systems of media control can now deliver ideological messages more subtly, with the help of little-known intermediaries like anonymous commenters on websites.
Interpretation
Decentralized online conversations can easily influence public opinion, allowing regimes to disseminate messages subtly.
This quote highlights the shift in how information is shared and controlled in the digital age. It emphasizes that the decentralized and often anonymous nature of online interactions provides new opportunities for manipulation of public opinion, where traditional centralized media control is bypassed, enabling regimes to spread their ideologies through covert means, such as anonymous commentary and social media influence.
In practice
In a discussion about the impact of social media on democracy, this quote can illustrate the risks of manipulation.
Just as Josef K, the protagonist of Kafka's 'The Trial,' awoke one day to discover that he had become part of some unfathomable legal carnival, we, too are frequently waking to discover that the rules of the digital game have once again profoundly changed.
Technological defeatism - a belief that, since a given technology is here to stay, there's nothing we can do about it other than get on with it and simply adjust our norms - is a persistent feature of social thought about technology. We'll come to pay for it very dearly.
For many oppositional movements, the Internet, while providing the opportunity to distribute information more quickly and cheaper, may have actually made their struggle more difficult in the long run.
I have no problem with technological solutions to social problems. The key question for me is, 'Who gets to implement them?' and, 'What kinds of politics of reform do technological solutions smuggle through the back door?'
The newspaper offers something very different from Google's aggregators. It offers a value system, an idea of what matters in the world. Newspapers need to start articulating that value.
Social media's greatest assets - anonymity, 'virality,' interconnectedness - are also its main weaknesses.
Technology should do the hard work, so you can get on and live your life. We're only at one percent of what's possible, and we're moving slow relative to the opportunity we have.
Take Google Maps or Waze. On the one hand, they amplify human ability - you are able to reach your destination faster and more easily. But at the same time, you are shifting the authority to the algorithm and losing your ability to find your own way.
... you just can't differentiate between a robot and the very best of humans.
The optimism that many felt in the 1960s over labour-saving technology is giving way to a fearful question: 'Will your labour be good for anything in the future? Or will you be replaced by a machine?'
Technology will move faster than governments, so don't legislate before you understand the consequences.
Technological society has succeeded in multiplying the opportunities for pleasure, but it has great difficulty in generating joy.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.