Parents are usually more careful to bestow knowledge on their children rather than virtue, the art of speaking well rather than doing well; but their manners should be of the greatest concern.
It is a fact today that one in ten thousand of us can make a technological breakthrough capable of supporting all the rest.
Interpretation
What this quote means
Only a few individuals can create significant technological advances that benefit everyone.
The quote by R. Buckminster Fuller illustrates the rarity of individuals who possess the ability to innovate and create technological breakthroughs that can profoundly impact society. It suggests that while the world may have countless individuals, only a small fraction are capable of developing ideas or inventions that can support and uplift the larger community, highlighting the importance of such exceptional thinkers in driving progress and change.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a discussion about the future of technology, one might say, 'As R. Buckminster Fuller noted, it is a fact today that one in ten thousand of us can make a technological breakthrough capable of supporting all the rest.'
More from R. Buckminster Fuller
All quotes βThere is no such thing as genius, some children are just less damaged than others.
Only the free-wheeling artist-explorer, non-academic, scientist-philosopher, mechanic, economist-poet who has never waited for patron-starting and accrediting of his co-ordinate capabilities holds the prime initiative today.
The end move in politics is always to pick up a gun.
I have spent most of my life unlearning things that were proved not to be true
The earth is like a spaceship that didn't come with an operating manual.
Similar quotes
The new source of power is not money in the hands of a few, but information in the hands of many.
By 2010 computers will disappear. They'll be so small, they'll be embedded in our clothing, in our environment. Images will be written directly to our retina, providing full-immersion virtual reality, augmented real reality. We'll be interacting with virtual personalities.
The critical question is: How do we ensure that the Internet develops in a way that is compatible with democracy?
I have got a scheme to make a thing in the form of a horse with a steam engine in the inside so contrived as to move an immense pair of wings, fixed on the outside of the horse, in such a manner as to carry it up into the air while a person sits on its back.
Our growing ability to eliminate the slow-moving aspects of entertainment and go hopping from one peak to another is not without cost. Stand-up comics, movie-makers and others who earn their living entertaining no longer "waste" time with setups and plot development, lest we reach for the remote and click them off our screen. The result is a loss of subtlety, anticipation and nuance and, in the process, a coarsening of our discourse.
How do we convince people that in programming simplicity and clarity - in short: what mathematicians call elegance - are not a dispensable luxury, but a crucial matter that decides between success and failure?