Genius gives birth, talent delivers. What Rembrandt or Van Gogh saw in the night can never be seen again. Born writers of the future are amazed already at what they're seeing now, what we'll all see in time for the first time, and then see imitated many times by made writers.
Interpretation
Genius cultivates new ideas while talent refines and reproduces existing ones.
In this quote, Jack Kerouac emphasizes the distinction between genius and talent, suggesting that true genius creates original and unparalleled work, while talent is more focused on delivering and imitating those original creations. He reflects on the visionary insights of remarkable artists like Rembrandt and Van Gogh, asserting that their unique perspectives will never be replicated, even as future writers are inspired by their visions and strive to capture their essence in new forms through imitation and interpretation.
In practice
In a speech about the influence of artists, I could use this quote to highlight the importance of originality in art.
Dharma Bums refusing to subscribe to the general demand that they consume production and therefore have to work for the privilege of consuming, all that cramp they didn't really want anyway such as refrigerators, TV sets, cars, at least new fancy cars, certain hair oils and deodorants and general junk you finally always see a week later in the garbage anyway, all of them imprisoned in a system of work, produce, consume, work, produce, consume.
I was amazed by the fact that I was not the only writer living, not the only young man "with a locomotive in his chest, and that's a fact," not the only youth with a million hungers and not one of them appeasable, not the only one who is lonely among multitudes, and does not know why.
My aunt once said that the world would never find peace until men fell at their women's feet and asked for forgiveness.
The bus roared through Indiana cornfields that night; the moon illuminated the ghostly gathered husks; it was almost Halloween. I made the acquaintance of a girl and we necked all the way to Indianapolis. She was nearsighted. When we got off to eat I had to lead her by the hand to the lunch counter. She bought my meals; my sandwiches were all gone. In exchange I told her long stories.
Holding up my purring cat to the moon. I sighed.
It seemed like a matter of minutes when we began rolling in the foothills before Oakland and suddenly reached a height and saw stretched out ahead of us the fabulous white city of San Francisco on her eleven mystic hills with the blue Pacific and its advancing wall of potato-patch fog beyond, and smoke and goldenness in the late afternoon of time.
As you get older, you have different tools, and you learn to use photography differently.
The good critic is he who relates the adventures of his soul among masterpieces.
There are so many separate selves; no one who writes creatively hasn't felt that.
Audience members are only concerned about the story, the concept, the bells and whistles and the noise that a popular film starts to make even before it's popular. So audiences will not be drawn to the technology; they'll be drawn to the story. And I hope it always remains that way.
The art of the critic in a nutshell: to coin slogans without betraying ideas. The slogans of an inadequate criticism peddle ideas to fashion.
I have always included minority characters in my stories, often as heroes.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.