There is no plausible theory under which the record of the Pentagon Papers can be interpreted as relating to the national defense.
Government actually grew during the Reagan years.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote highlights the irony that government size and influence increased during Ronald Reagan's presidency despite his rhetoric about reducing government.
Noam Chomsky's quote points to the contradiction in Ronald Reagan's policies, where, despite promoting a philosophy of reducing the size and role of government, the government in fact expanded during his administration. This suggests that the realities of political governance often diverge from the principles espoused by leaders, and that narratives around government power can be complex and misleading.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a discussion about the expansion of government programs, one might use this quote to illustrate Reagan's contradictory policies.
More from Noam Chomsky
All quotes βThe 'free-floating intellectual' may occupy himself with problems because of their inherent interest and importance, perhaps to little effect.
If you're teaching today what you were teaching five years ago, either the field is dead or you are.
There are very few people who are going to look into the mirror and say, 'That person I see is a savage monster;' instead, they make up some construction that justifies what they do.
The Republican Party has become overwhelmingly so extreme that it's hardly a traditional political party anymore.
There is still much debate about whether torture has been effective in eliciting information - the assumption being, apparently, that if it is effective, then it may be justified.
Similar quotes
If the General Government should be left dependent on the State Legislatures, it would be happy for us if we had never met in this room.
Major international interventions are doomed unless the US is directly or indirectly involved. But if American politicians, officials and servicemen are to be put at risk of arrest and prosecution, the United States will be most reluctant to act in order to curb aggression or prevent genocide. So the effect of the court may well be to diminish, not increase, the numbers of (in the words of the UN Secretary General) 'innocents of distant wars and conflicts'.
I will step outside the system. Voting for the βlesser evilβ-or failing to vote at all-is part of the corporate agenda to crush what is left of our anemic democracy. And those who continue to participate in the vaudeville of a two-party process, who refuse to confront in every way possible the structures of corporate power, assure our mutual destruction.
Our democracy's history is littered with names we neither remember nor celebrate - people who stood in the way of progress while protecting the powerful. On Wednesday, a number of senators voted to join that list.
The government, which was designed for the people, has got into the hands of the bosses and their employers, the special interests. An invisible empire has been set up above the forms of democracy.
The only difference between the Democrats and the Republicans is that the Democrats allow the poor to be corrupt, too.