But which is the State's essential function, aggression or defence, few seem to know or care.
Benjamin TuckerRead
Government is the assumption of authority over a given area and all within it, exercised generally for the double purpose of more complete oppression of its subjects and extension of its boundaries.
Interpretation
This quote critiques the nature of government as a means of control and expansion.
Benjamin Tucker's quote highlights the dual function of government: to exert dominance over its citizens while simultaneously seeking to expand its influence and territory. This perspective emphasizes the often oppressive nature of governmental authority and raises questions about the true motivations behind political power.
In practice
During a political debate, one might use this quote to emphasize the need for accountability in government actions.
But which is the State's essential function, aggression or defence, few seem to know or care.
The main question ... is not what motive inspired the law, but what it will be possible for men of bad motive to do with the law.
There is no freedom that I would grant to any man that I would refuse to woman, and there is no freedom that I would refuse to either man or woman except the freedom to invade ... whoever has the ballot has the freedom to invade, and whoever wants the ballot wants the freedom to invade. Give woman equality with man, by all means; but do it by taking power from man, not giving it to woman.
Voting is merely a labor-saving device for ascertaining on which side force lies and bowing to the inevitable... It is neither more nor less than a paper representative of the bayonet, the bully, and the bullet.
To force a man to pay for the violation of his own liberty is indeed an addition of insult to injury.
Anarchism does not repudiate the right of ownership, but it has a conception thereof sufficiently different from [others'] to include the possibility of an end of that social organization which will arise, not out of the ruins of government, but out of the transformation of government into voluntary association for defence.
I want to say, and this is very important: at the end we lucked out. It was luck that prevented nuclear war. We came that close to nuclear war at the end. Rational individuals: Kennedy was rational; Khrushchev was rational; Castro was rational. Rational individuals came that close to total destruction of their societies. And that danger exists today.
Nobody should have any illusions. The United States has essentially a one-party system and the ruling party is the business party.
None of us here in Washington knows all or even half of the answers ... If you love your country, don't depend on handouts from Washington for your information. If you cherish your freedom, don't leave it all up to big government.
Hamas is regularly described as 'Iranian-backed Hamas, which is dedicated to the destruction of Israel.' One will be hard put to find something like 'democratically elected Hamas, which has long been calling for a two-state settlement in accord with the international consensus'—blocked for over 30 years by the US and Israel. All true, but not a useful contribution to the Party Line, hence dispensable.
Two kinds of men generally best succeed in political life; men of no principle, but of great talent; and men of no talent, but of one principle - that of obedience to their superiors.
Fighting corruption is not just good governance. It's self-defense. It's patriotism.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.