But which is the State's essential function, aggression or defence, few seem to know or care.
Benjamin TuckerRead
Anarchism does not repudiate the right of ownership, but it has a conception thereof sufficiently different from [others'] to include the possibility of an end of that social organization which will arise, not out of the ruins of government, but out of the transformation of government into voluntary association for defence.
Interpretation
Anarchism believes in ownership but envisions it within a framework of voluntary associations instead of government control.
This quote by Benjamin Tucker encapsulates a fundamental tenet of anarchism, which is the belief in the right to ownership but distinguishes itself by proposing a future where ownership and social organization transform from governmental authority to voluntary cooperation among individuals. It suggests a vision of society where people unite for mutual protection and support, rather than being governed by coercive structures.
In practice
In a discussion on political philosophies, one might use this quote to illustrate anarchism's view on ownership.
But which is the State's essential function, aggression or defence, few seem to know or care.
The main question ... is not what motive inspired the law, but what it will be possible for men of bad motive to do with the law.
There is no freedom that I would grant to any man that I would refuse to woman, and there is no freedom that I would refuse to either man or woman except the freedom to invade ... whoever has the ballot has the freedom to invade, and whoever wants the ballot wants the freedom to invade. Give woman equality with man, by all means; but do it by taking power from man, not giving it to woman.
Government is the assumption of authority over a given area and all within it, exercised generally for the double purpose of more complete oppression of its subjects and extension of its boundaries.
Voting is merely a labor-saving device for ascertaining on which side force lies and bowing to the inevitable... It is neither more nor less than a paper representative of the bayonet, the bully, and the bullet.
To force a man to pay for the violation of his own liberty is indeed an addition of insult to injury.
If I'm not mistaken, Sigmund Freud said that in every idealisation there's an aggression. Depicting the Pope as a sort of Superman, a star, is offensive to me. The pope is a man who laughs, cries, sleeps calmly and has friends like everyone else. A normal person.
In the end, I had to call myself a faggot, which really annoyed me, because 1. I don't think that word should ever be used by anyone, let alone me, and 2. As it happens, I am not gay, and furthermore, 3. Chuck Parson made it out like calling yourself a faggot was the ultimate humiliation, even though there's nothing at all embarrassing about being gay.
The gift of language is the single human trait that marks us all genetically, setting us apart from the rest of life.
The childhood shows the man, as morning shows the day.
Cultivators of the earth are the most valuable citizens. They are the most vigorous, the most independent, the most virtuous and they are tied to their country and wedded to its liberty and interests by the most lasting bands.
One of the things I have noticed about my novels is that they all concern people who can't quite bring themselves to tell the truth about their own lives... I've come to realise that this interest in damaged, untellable stories comes from my parents.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.