Be truthful. Nature only sides with truth.
Adolf LoosRead
Does it follow that the house has nothing in common with art and is architecture not to be included in the arts? Only a very small part of architecture belongs to art: the tomb and the monument. Everything else that fulfils a function is to be excluded from the domain of art.
Interpretation
Architecture's relationship with art is limited, with only functional elements being excluded from artistic value.
Adolf Loos argues that while architecture may contain artistic elements, many functional aspects should not be considered art. He suggests that only structures that serve a commemorative or memorial purpose, such as tombs and monuments, can be included in the artistic domain, whereas most architecture aims primarily to fulfill practical functions.
In practice
In a lecture about architecture's purpose, I cited Loos to emphasize the utility of design in modern buildings.
Be truthful. Nature only sides with truth.
The house has to please everyone, contrary to the work of art which does not. The work is a private matter for the artist. The house is not.
The house has to serve comfort. The work of art is revolutionary; the house is conservative.
Architecture arouses sentiments in man. The architect's task therefore, is to make those sentiments more precise.
If you know exactly what you're going to do, what's the good in doing _x000D_ it?
Sometimes it is the artist's task to find out how much music you can still make with what you have left.
Bad art is a great deal worse than no art at all.
Without tradition, art is a flock of sheep without a shepherd. Without innovation, it is a corpse.
Art consists of limitation. The most beautiful part of every picture is the frame.
It is the duty of the younger Negro artist . . . to change through the force of his art that old whispering "I want to be white," hidden in the aspirations of his people, to "Why should I want to be white? I am a Negro - and beautiful!"
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.