The introduction of a substantial Government transfer tax on all transactions might prove the most serviceable reform available,with a view to mitigating the predominance of speculation in the United States.
Interpretation
Keynes suggests that implementing a significant tax on government transfers may help reduce speculation in the economy.
In this quote, John Maynard Keynes discusses the potential benefits of instituting a transfer tax as a means to address the issues of speculation in the financial markets of the United States. He argues that such a tax could serve as an effective reform measure to stabilize the economy by discouraging excessive speculative behavior that can lead to market volatility.
In practice
Use this quote in a discussion about economic reforms and taxation policies.
As time goes on, I get more and more convinced that the right method of investment is to put fairly large sums into enterprises which one thinks one knows something about and in the management of which one thoroughly believes.
The ideas of economists and political philosophers, both when they are right and when they are wrong, are more powerful than is generally understood. Indeed, the world is ruled by little else.
The disruptive powers of excessive national fecundity may have played a greater part in bursting the bonds of convention than either the power of ideas or the errors of autocracy.
We will not have any more crashes in our time.
This long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead. Economists set themselves too easy, too useless a task if in tempestuous seasons they can only tell us that when the storm is long past the ocean is flat again.
The book, as it stands, seems to me to be one of the most frightful muddles I have ever read, with scarcely a sound proposition in it beginning with page 45 [Hayek provided historical background up to page 45; after that came his theoretical model], and yet it remains a book of some interest, which is likely to leave its mark on the mind of the reader. It is an extraordinary example of how, starting with a mistake, a remorseless logician can end up in bedlam.
The more the division of labor and the application of machinery extend, the more does competition extend among the workers, the more do their wages shrink together.
When people begin anticipating inflation, it doesn't do you any good anymore, because any benefit of inflation comes from the fact that you do better than you thought you were going to do.
I think there's a lot of merit in an international economy and global markets, but they're not sufficient because markets don't look after social needs.
Economic medicine that was previously meted out by the cupful has recently been dispensed by the barrel. These once unthinkable dosages will almost certainly bring on unwelcome after-effects. Their precise nature is anyone's guess, though one likely consequence is an onslaught of inflation.
That's the world we live in: when it comes to economics, people have emotions; it's not like chemistry or physics.
On the market, all is harmony. But as soon as intervention appears and is established, conflict is created, for each may participate in a scramble to be a net gainer rather than a net loser - to be part of the invading team instead of one of the victims.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.