There is no plausible theory under which the record of the Pentagon Papers can be interpreted as relating to the national defense.
Noam ChomskyRead
The invasion of Iraq, particularly, gave a big shot in the arm to the jihadi extremists.
Interpretation
The Iraq invasion fueled the motivation and growth of extremist groups.
Noam Chomsky's quote suggests that the invasion of Iraq had unintended consequences, notably strengthening the position and recruitment capabilities of jihadi extremists. This reflects the complex and often counterproductive nature of military interventions, where actions taken in the name of peace or security can ironically create more instability and violence.
In practice
During a debate on the impacts of foreign policy decisions on terrorism.
There is no plausible theory under which the record of the Pentagon Papers can be interpreted as relating to the national defense.
The 'free-floating intellectual' may occupy himself with problems because of their inherent interest and importance, perhaps to little effect.
If you're teaching today what you were teaching five years ago, either the field is dead or you are.
There are very few people who are going to look into the mirror and say, 'That person I see is a savage monster;' instead, they make up some construction that justifies what they do.
The Republican Party has become overwhelmingly so extreme that it's hardly a traditional political party anymore.
There is still much debate about whether torture has been effective in eliciting information - the assumption being, apparently, that if it is effective, then it may be justified.
The necessity of reciprocal checks in the exercise of political power, by dividing and distributing it into different depositories, and constituting each the guardian of the public weal against invasions by the others, has been evinced by experiments ancient and modern, some of them in our country and under our own eyes.
It is hard to feel individually responsible with respect to the invisible processes of a huge and distant government.
Government should fear the people, not the other way around.
There is too much disagreement for disagreement's sake. In a time of persistent challenges that still call into question our most sacred aspirations as a country, we cannot afford shallow callous divisiveness in our public debate.
No wonder Americans hate politics when, year in and year out, they hear politicians make promises that won't come true because they don't even mean them - campaign fantasies that win elections but don't get nations moving again
There is no private domain of a person's life that is not political, and there is no political issue that is not ultimately personal.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.