There is no plausible theory under which the record of the Pentagon Papers can be interpreted as relating to the national defense.
From the late 1940s, into and through the '50s, there developed a complex interaction between federal government, state and local government, real-estate interests, commercial interests and court decisions, which had the effect of undermining the mass transit system across the country.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote highlights how various governmental and commercial interests negatively impacted mass transit systems in the U.S.
Noam Chomsky’s quote reflects on the intricate relationships between different levels of government and commercial interests during the late 1940s and 1950s, indicating how their influences contributed to the deterioration of public mass transit systems. This deterioration can be seen as a result of policies and decisions that prioritized private interests over the public transportation needs of the population, showing a significant shift in urban development priorities that neglected sustainable transit solutions.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a discussion about urban planning, this quote can illustrate the complexities involved in improving public transportation.
More from Noam Chomsky
All quotes →The 'free-floating intellectual' may occupy himself with problems because of their inherent interest and importance, perhaps to little effect.
If you're teaching today what you were teaching five years ago, either the field is dead or you are.
There are very few people who are going to look into the mirror and say, 'That person I see is a savage monster;' instead, they make up some construction that justifies what they do.
The Republican Party has become overwhelmingly so extreme that it's hardly a traditional political party anymore.
There is still much debate about whether torture has been effective in eliciting information - the assumption being, apparently, that if it is effective, then it may be justified.
Similar quotes
Technological discoveries are the spermatozoa of social change.
Digital presentation is just television in public; we're all just getting together and watching TV without pointing the remote control at the screen.
The internet is watching us now. If they want to. They can see what sites you visit. In the future, television will be watching us, and customizing itself to what it knows about us. The thrilling thing is, that will make us feel we're part of the medium. The scary thing is, we'll lose our right to privacy. An ad will appear in the air around us, talking directly to us.
The true end users of Facebook are the marketers who want to reach and influence us. They are Facebook's paying customers; we are the product. And we are its workers. The countless hours that we - and the young, particularly - spend on our profiles are the unpaid labor on which Facebook justifies its stock valuation.
When you go to Japan, there is such a talent shortage that the debate about AI taking jobs is almost non-existent. The debate is, how can we automate this so we can get all the work done?
Whatever they announce, they announce. They're in their honeymoon period, and anything they announce gets hype ... They will obviously branch out beyond Internet search, but I think the expectations won't live up to reality.