Meaning is a shaky edifice we build out of scraps, dogmas, childhood injuries, newspaper articles, chance remarks, old fillms, small victories, people hated, people loved; perhaps it is because our sense of what is the case is constructed from such inadequate materials that we defend it so fiercely, even to death.
Interpretation
Meaning is built from our experiences and influences, often flawed, yet we defend it fiercely.
In this quote, Salman Rushdie reflects on the nature of meaning in our lives, suggesting that it is not a solid foundation but rather a fragile structure made up of various and sometimes inadequate influences, such as personal experiences, beliefs, and societal inputs. This fragility leads us to defend our sense of meaning vehemently, as it is so intertwined with our identities and perceptions of reality, even in the face of dissent or challenges.
In practice
In a discussion about identity at a philosophy meetup.
I've been fascinated by Machiavelli since I was very young. I've always felt that he had a bad rap from history, and that he was actually a person quite unlike what we now think of as Machiavellian. He was a republican. He disliked totalitarian government.
Killing people because you don't like their ideas - it's a bad thing.
faith without doubt is addiction
I am clearly vulnerable to these more passionate and volatile unstable relationships. I am trying to not be so vulnerable.
In India, as elsewhere in our darkening world, religion is the poison in the blood. Where religion intervenes, mere innocence is no excuse. Yet we go on skating around this issue, speaking of religion in the fashionable language of 'respect.' What is there to respect in any of this, or in any of the crimes now being committed almost daily around the world in religion's dreaded name?
Reality is a question of perspective; the further you get from the past, the more concrete and plausible it seems - but as you approach the present, it inevitably seems more and more incredible.
Generally, I tend to despise human behavior rather than human creatures.
Were it part of our everyday education and comment that the corporation is an instrument for the exercise of power, that it belongs to the process by which we are governed, there would then be debate on how that power is used and how it might be made subordinate to the public will and need. This debate is avoided by propagating the myth that the power does not exist.
We know that freedom has many dimensions. It is the right of the man who tills the land to own the land; the right of the workers to join together to seek better conditions of labor; the right of businessmen to use ingenuity and foresight to produce and distribute without arbitrary interference in a truly competitive economy.
As long as a human being worries about when he will die, and what he has that is his,_x000D_ all of his works are zero._x000D_ When affection for the I-creature and what it owns is dead,_x000D_ then the work of the Teacher is over.
It is good to know what a man is, and also what the world takes him for. But you do not understand him until you have learnt how he understands himself.
Pre-emptive war might fall within the framework of international law.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.