Political activism is not failing because people are too busy watching cat videos online, but because of a fundamental collapse of citizen leverage on institutions of power like governments and corporations.
Zeynep TufekciRead
You might be tempted to think that China has a Streisand-effect problem, in which trying to censor an event creates even more publicity. But that assumes the Chinese government doesn't understand the Streisand effect, and that can't be right, because if one government understands attention dynamics online, it's China's.
Interpretation
The quote highlights the Chinese government's awareness of the unintended consequences of censorship, particularly in the digital age.
Zeynep Tufekci's quote addresses the complex nature of censorship, using the example of the Streisand effect, which describes how attempts to suppress information can lead to greater public interest. It suggests that the Chinese government is not naive about how online attention works, implying that their actions are calculated and strategic rather than misguided attempts at control.
In practice
In a discussion on media control, this quote can illustrate the paradox of censorship.
Political activism is not failing because people are too busy watching cat videos online, but because of a fundamental collapse of citizen leverage on institutions of power like governments and corporations.
Given exponential growth dynamics of infectious diseases, containing an epidemic is straightforward early on, but nearly impossible once a disease spreads among a population.
Remember, the Internet did not create freedom of speech; in theory, we always had freedom of speech - it's just that it often went along with the freedom to be ignored. People had no access to the infrastructure to be heard.
Attention, to a terrorist group, is often what the well-meaning, outraged response is to your two-bit Internet troll: it is the food that feeds them.
Much of what ails our modern life is exactly because we reduce the value of a human being to a number, say salary or consumer power.
A 'fair' fight between non-equals is not fair, and being blind to power is an implicit endorsement of the powerful.
Politics is the art of acquiring, holding, and wielding power.
That politician who curries favor with the citizens and indulges them and fawns upon them and has a presentiment of their wishes, and is skillful in gratifying them, he is esteemed a great statesman.
No part of the education of a politician is more indispensable than the fighting of elections.
If, then, the control of the people over the organs of their government be the measure of its republicanism, and I confess I know no other measure, it must be agreed that our governments have much less of republicanism than ought to have been expected; in other words, that the people have less regular control over their agents, than their rights and their interests require.
The politician's promises of yesterday are the taxes of today.
I think it's about time! Who cares whether he is looking for votes or not! At least your country is moving forward with the times!
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.