Given exponential growth dynamics of infectious diseases, containing an epidemic is straightforward early on, but nearly impossible once a disease spreads among a population.
Zeynep TufekciRead
Political activism is not failing because people are too busy watching cat videos online, but because of a fundamental collapse of citizen leverage on institutions of power like governments and corporations.
Interpretation
Political activism suffers not from distractions but from a loss of influence over powerful institutions.
In this quote, Zeynep Tufekci highlights that the decline in political activism is not merely due to people's engagement with trivial online content like cat videos, but rather stems from a deeper issue where citizens feel powerless against influential entities such as governments and corporations. This suggests that the root cause of political apathy lies in a systemic failure to empower individuals to enact change and hold authorities accountable.
In practice
During a political rally, when discussing the importance of citizen engagement in governance.
Given exponential growth dynamics of infectious diseases, containing an epidemic is straightforward early on, but nearly impossible once a disease spreads among a population.
Remember, the Internet did not create freedom of speech; in theory, we always had freedom of speech - it's just that it often went along with the freedom to be ignored. People had no access to the infrastructure to be heard.
Attention, to a terrorist group, is often what the well-meaning, outraged response is to your two-bit Internet troll: it is the food that feeds them.
Much of what ails our modern life is exactly because we reduce the value of a human being to a number, say salary or consumer power.
You might be tempted to think that China has a Streisand-effect problem, in which trying to censor an event creates even more publicity. But that assumes the Chinese government doesn't understand the Streisand effect, and that can't be right, because if one government understands attention dynamics online, it's China's.
A 'fair' fight between non-equals is not fair, and being blind to power is an implicit endorsement of the powerful.
When people don't understand that the government doesn't have their interests in mind, they're more susceptible to go to war.
There is no hope even that woman, with her right to vote, will ever purify politics.
I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing, and as necessary in the political world as storms in the physical.
The government that governs from afar absolutely requires that the truth and the facts reach its knowledge by every possible channel, so that it may weigh and estimate them better, and this need increases when a country like the Philippines is concerned, where the inhabitants speak and complain in a language unknown to the authorities.
The world must be made safe for democracy.
Africans require, want, the franchise on the basis of one man one vote. They want political independence.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.