There is no plausible theory under which the record of the Pentagon Papers can be interpreted as relating to the national defense.
The money in politics is a cash cow for the media.
Interpretation
What this quote means
This quote suggests that financial interests in politics benefit the media significantly.
Noam Chomsky's quote reflects the idea that financial contributions and monetary interests in political processes serve as a lucrative opportunity for media organizations, effectively making politics a source of revenue. This highlights the intertwining of media and politics, where the media can profit from the political landscape due to the financial transactions occurring within it, often prioritizing sensationalism and coverage that attract viewers and advertisers over critical journalism.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a discussion about media bias, one could reference Chomsky's quote to highlight how financial interests can influence news coverage.
More from Noam Chomsky
All quotes βThe 'free-floating intellectual' may occupy himself with problems because of their inherent interest and importance, perhaps to little effect.
If you're teaching today what you were teaching five years ago, either the field is dead or you are.
There are very few people who are going to look into the mirror and say, 'That person I see is a savage monster;' instead, they make up some construction that justifies what they do.
The Republican Party has become overwhelmingly so extreme that it's hardly a traditional political party anymore.
There is still much debate about whether torture has been effective in eliciting information - the assumption being, apparently, that if it is effective, then it may be justified.
Similar quotes
The master class has always declared the wars; the subject class has always fought the battles. The master class had all to gain and nothing to lose, while the subject class has had nothing to gain and all to lose - especially their lives.
The care of human life and happiness, and not their destruction, is the first and only object of good government.
Dictators, unlike Democrats, depend on a small coterie to sustain their power. These backers, generally drawn from the military, the senior civil service, and family or clan members, have a synergistic relationship with their dictator. The dictator delivers opportunities for them to become rich, and they protect him from being overthrown.
I may find Saddam Hussein's regime abhorrent - any normal person would - but the survival of it is in his hands.
My message to the people and rulers of Pakistan is, 'As neighbours, we want peace and friendship and cooperation with you so that together we can change the face of South Asia.'
He (Saddam Hussein) has not developed any significant capability with respect to weapons of mass destruction. He is unable to project conventional power against his neighbours.