Science is a way to not fool ourselves.
The nuclear arms race is like two sworn enemies standing waist deep in gasoline, one with three matches, the other with five.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote illustrates the dangerous escalation of the nuclear arms race, where both sides are heavily armed and on the brink of destruction.
Carl Sagan's quote uses the metaphor of two enemies standing in gasoline to convey the precariousness and volatility of the nuclear arms race. The matches symbolize the capability for mutual destruction that both parties possess, highlighting the dire consequences of escalating military capabilities without resolving underlying conflicts. The imagery emphasizes that both sides are equally vulnerable and that any spark could lead to catastrophic consequences.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a speech about disarmament, one might say, 'As Carl Sagan warned, the nuclear arms race is like two sworn enemies in gasoline, and we must find a way to extinguish the flames.'
More from Carl Sagan
All quotes βIn more than one respect, the exploring of the Solar System and homesteading other worlds constitutes the beginning, much more than the end, of history.
How smart does a chimpanzee have to be before killing him constitutes murder?
The hole in the ozone layer is a kind of skywriting. At first it seemed to spell out our continuing complacency before a witch's brew of deadly perils. But perhaps it really tells of a newfound talent to work together to protect the global environment.
There is a reward structure in science that is very interesting: Our highest honors go to those who disprove the findings of the most revered among us. So Einstein is revered not just because he made so many fundamental contributions to science, but because he found an imperfection in the fundamental contribution of Isaac Newton.
The simplest thought, like the concept of the number one, has an elaborate logical underpinning.
Similar quotes
Intelligence makes clear to us the interrelationship of means and ends. But mere thinking cannot give us a sense of the ultimate and fundamental ends. To make clear these fundamental ends and valuations and to set them fast in the emotional life of the individual, seems to me precisely the most important function which religion has to form in the social life of man.
We call the one side [of humanity] religion, and we call the other science. Religion is always right. ... Science is always wrong; it is the very artifice of men. Science can never solve one problem without raising ten more problems.
A horse, a horse, my kingdom for a horse!
In apartments and cottages, on the street and in the train... I listen... More and more, I turn into one large ear, always turning to another person.
America's answer to the intolerant man is diversity - the very diversity which our heritage of religious freedom has inspired.
But if you seek forgiveness, doesn't that automatically mean you cannot be a monster? By definition, doesn't that desperation make you human again?