There is no plausible theory under which the record of the Pentagon Papers can be interpreted as relating to the national defense.
Noam ChomskyRead
Occasionally the conflict between 'what we stand for' and 'what we do' has been forthrightly addressed.
Interpretation
The quote highlights the disparity between our principles and actions.
Noam Chomsky's quote emphasizes the importance of aligning our beliefs with our actions. It suggests that there are times when we must confront the uncomfortable reality of how our behaviors may not reflect our stated values, prompting a need for introspection and consistency in our lives.
In practice
In a speech about personal integrity, one might quote Chomsky to emphasize the need for consistency between beliefs and actions.
There is no plausible theory under which the record of the Pentagon Papers can be interpreted as relating to the national defense.
The 'free-floating intellectual' may occupy himself with problems because of their inherent interest and importance, perhaps to little effect.
If you're teaching today what you were teaching five years ago, either the field is dead or you are.
There are very few people who are going to look into the mirror and say, 'That person I see is a savage monster;' instead, they make up some construction that justifies what they do.
The Republican Party has become overwhelmingly so extreme that it's hardly a traditional political party anymore.
There is still much debate about whether torture has been effective in eliciting information - the assumption being, apparently, that if it is effective, then it may be justified.
We do not despise all those who have vices, but we do despise those that have no virtue.
Both state and church have as their object actions as well as convictions, the former insofar as they are based on the relations between man and nature, the latter insofar as they are based on the relations between nature and God.
Jesus has borne the death penalty on our behalf. Behold the wonder! There He hang upon the cross!
Not only does the universe have its own laws, all of them indifferent to the contradictory dreams and desires of humanity, and in the formulation of which we contribute not one iota, apart, that is, from the words by which we clumsily name them, but everything seems to indicate that it uses these laws for aims and objectives that transcend and always will transcend our understanding.
How do we see physically? No differently that we do in our consciousness - by means of the productive power of imagination. Consciousness is the eye and ear, the sense for inner and outer meaning.
No man chooses evil because it's evil. He only mistakes it for happiness, the good he seeks.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.