One area of law more than any other besmirches the constitutional vision of human dignity. . . . The barbaric death penalty violates our Constitution. Even the most vile murderer does not release the state from its obligation to respect dignity, for the state does not honor the victim by< emulating his murderer. Capital punishment's fatal flaw is that it treats people as objects to be toyed with and discarded. . . . One day the Court will outlaw the death penalty. Permanently.
Interpretation
The quote emphasizes the importance of upholding human dignity even in the face of heinous crimes, arguing against the morality of the death penalty.
William J. Brennan's quote critiques capital punishment, asserting that it undermines the constitutional ideal of human dignity. He argues that even those who commit horrific acts should be treated with respect, as the state's response through execution merely mirrors the violence of the crime and ignores the sanctity of life. Brennan believes that true justice must honor the dignity of every human being, regardless of their actions, and he expresses hope that the death penalty will eventually be abolished.
In practice
During a debate on criminal justice reform, this quote can be used to advocate for the abolition of the death penalty.
If our free society is to endure, those who govern must recognize human dignity and accept the enforcement of constitutional limitations on their power conceived by the Framers . . . . Such recognition will not come from a technical understanding of the organs of government, or the new forms of wealth they administer. It requires something different, something deeper-a personal confrontation with the wellsprings of our society.
Law cannot stand aside from the social changes around it.
At bottom, the battle has been waged on moral grounds. The country has debated whether a society for which the dignity of the individual is the supreme value can, without a fundamental inconsistency, follow the practice of deliberately putting one of its members to death.
There can be no doubt that our Nation has had a long and unfortunate history of sex discrimination. Traditionally, such discrimination was rationalized by an attitude of "romantic paternalism" which, in practical effect, put women, not on a pedestal, but in a cage.
Use of a mentally ill person's involuntary confession is antithetical to the notion of fundamental fairness embodied in the due process clause.
The Framers of the Bill of Rights did not purport to 'create' rights. Rather, they designed the Bill of Rights to prohibit our Government from infringing rights and liberties presumed to be preexisting.
For an occurrence to become an adventure, it is necessary and sufficient for one to recount it.
I have yet to see a piece of writing, political or non-political, that does not have a slant. All writing slants the way a writer leans, and no man is born perpendicular.
People shouldn't call for demons unless they really mean what they say.
In every man's mind the good seeds of liberty are planted, and he who brings his fellow down so low, as to make him contented with a condition of slavery, commits the highest crime against God and man.
It is often said by religious people that without its framework, there is no sense of right or wrong. My view is that religion comes after ethics.
God is the Great Engineer, creating circumstances to bring about moments in our lives of divine importance, leading us to divine appointments
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.