There is no plausible theory under which the record of the Pentagon Papers can be interpreted as relating to the national defense.
The Oslo Accords in 1993 determined that the Gaza Strip and the West Bank are a single territorial entity which cannot be divided. Immediately, the United States and Israel set about separating the two and making sure that they would not be united.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote discusses how the Oslo Accords aimed to unify the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, but subsequent actions by the U.S. and Israel sought to divide them.
Noam Chomsky’s quote reflects on the implications of the Oslo Accords, which were intended to bring peace and unity to the Palestinian territories of the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. However, it critiques the contrasting actions of the United States and Israel, suggesting that instead of fostering unity, their policies have been directed toward creating division and conflict, thereby undermining the intent of the Accords.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a political debate about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, this quote highlights the challenges of achieving unity.
More from Noam Chomsky
All quotes →The 'free-floating intellectual' may occupy himself with problems because of their inherent interest and importance, perhaps to little effect.
If you're teaching today what you were teaching five years ago, either the field is dead or you are.
There are very few people who are going to look into the mirror and say, 'That person I see is a savage monster;' instead, they make up some construction that justifies what they do.
The Republican Party has become overwhelmingly so extreme that it's hardly a traditional political party anymore.
There is still much debate about whether torture has been effective in eliciting information - the assumption being, apparently, that if it is effective, then it may be justified.
Similar quotes
There is one catagory of advertising which is totally uncontrolled and flagrantly dishonest: the television commercials for candidates in Presidential elections.
Nothing can be more evident, than that an exclusive power of regulating elections for the National Government, in the hands of the State Legislatures, would leave the existence of the Union entirely at their mercy . . . . It is to little purpose to say that a neglect or omission of this kind [not letting the feds have elections], would be unlikely to take place. The constitutional possibility of the thing, without an equivalent for the risk, is an unanswerable objection.
The faces and the tactics of the leaders may change every four years, or two, or one, but the people go on forever.
It's a good thing we don't get all the government we pay for.
If ever this free people, if this Government itself is ever utterly demoralized, it will come from this incessant human wriggle and struggle for office, which is but a way to live without work.
There are many causes why a people politically ignorant cannot be roused to action. Perfect political ignorance must be accompanied by indifference to the general interests of society, and thus one of the most powerful motives which can act on the human mind is totally destroyed.