I think women are really good at making friends and not good at networking. Men are good at networking and not necessarily making friends. That's a gross generalization, but I think it holds in many ways.
Madeleine AlbrightRead
People are finding it harder and harder to relate to foreign policy.
Interpretation
This quote highlights the growing disconnect between individuals and the complexities of foreign policy.
Madeleine Albright suggests that as global issues become more intricate and multifaceted, individuals are struggling to connect with and understand foreign policy decisions. This disconnect may stem from the overwhelming nature of international relations and the perception that such matters are distant from everyday life, leading to a sense of alienation from political discourse.
In practice
This quote can be used in discussions or speeches about the importance of public engagement in foreign affairs.
I think women are really good at making friends and not good at networking. Men are good at networking and not necessarily making friends. That's a gross generalization, but I think it holds in many ways.
My parents were of the generation who thought they were the children of a free Czechoslovakia, the only democracy in central Europe.
I really think that there was a great advantage in many ways to being a woman. I think we are a lot better at personal relationships, and then have the capability obviously of telling it like it is when it's necessary.
Well I do think, when there are more women, that the tone of the conversation changes, and also the goals of the conversation change. But it doesn't mean that the whole world would be a lot better if it were totally run by women. If you think that, you've forgotten high school.
The main thing is to remain oneself, under any circumstances; that was and is our common purpose.
You think that the heads of state only have serious conversations, but they actually often begin really with the weather or, 'I really like your tie.'
If I could have anything - you know, and this is across the board for any presidential candidate - I would have a greater acknowledgment of history in our policy and in our affairs.
With his mendacity and increasingly virulent attacks on immigrants, Muslims, women, the press, the judiciary, the intelligence services, the F.B.I. - any group or institution that he finds threatening or useful as a scapegoat - Mr. Trump is attempting the Orwellian trick of redefining American reality on his own terms.
Already long ago, from when we sold our vote to no man, the People have abdicated our duties; for the People who once upon a time handed out military command, high civil office, legions β everything, now restrains itself and anxiously hopes for just two things: bread and circuses.
If the United States loses the economic weapons of control, it is very much weakened.
I wish I could say I was shocked at the reports the NSA is secretly spying on the private phone calls of millions of Verizon customers. However, this is a predictable result of a government that continues to erode our liberties while promising some glimmering hope of security.
If more government is the answer, then it was a really stupid question.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.