People say we need religion when what they really mean is we need police.
Interpretation
This quote suggests that the need for religion is often a masked desire for social order and control.
H. L. Mencken's quote reflects the idea that the call for religion in society may stem from a deeper necessity for governance and law enforcement rather than a genuine spiritual need. It suggests that while religion is often viewed as a moral compass, what might truly be required is a structure to maintain order and authority, as people may crave the security that comes from external regulation, akin to what police provide.
In practice
In a debate about the role of religion in public life, this quote can highlight the need for societal structures.
I know a good many men of great learning-that is, men born with an extraordinary eagerness and capacity to acquire knowledge. One and all, they tell me that they can't recall learning anything of any value in school. All that schoolmasters managed to accomplish with them was to test and determine the amount of knowledge that they had already acquired independently-and not infrequently the determination was made clumsily and inaccurately.
It takes a long while for a naturally trustful person to reconcile himself to the idea that after all God will not help him
It is the theory of all modern civilized governments that they protect and foster the liberty of the citizen; it is the practice of all of them to limit its exercise, and sometimes very narrowly.
The central belief of every moron is that he is the victim of a mysterious conspiracy against his common rights and true deserts.
The cure for the evils of democracy is more democracy.
It is my conviction that no normal man ever fell in love, within the ordinary meaning of the term, after the age of thirty.
It is highly improbable that the bureaucrat will put his life on the line. It is absolutely impossible that he'll put his job on the line.
There is nothing more important to a democracy than an active and engaged press.
If, indeed, a firearm were more dangerous to its possessors than to potential aggressors, would it not make sense for the government to arm all criminals, and let them accidentally shoot themselves? Is this absurd? Yes, and yet the government, of course, is arming criminals.
The universe is like a safe to which there is a combination. But the combination is locked up in the safe.
Besides, do any of us understand what we are doing? If we did, would we ever do it?
He, who survives his reputation, lives out of despite himself, like a man listening to his own reproach.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.