Teach your daughters, teach your granddaughters, everybody has to have something that they're good at where they can earn a living.
Judy SheindlinRead
When I was a practising lawyer in the family court, there were too many judges who, when you left their courtroom, you didn't know whether you'd won or whether you'd lost.
Interpretation
Judges should provide clarity in their rulings, so lawyers know the outcomes of their cases.
In the quote, Judy Sheindlin emphasizes the importance of clarity in judicial rulings. As a practising lawyer, she observed that many judges left the outcomes of cases ambiguous, which created confusion for the lawyers and their clients about whether they had achieved a favorable decision or not. This highlights a critical aspect of justice—having a clear understanding of legal results is essential for all parties involved.
In practice
During a legal seminar discussing judicial effectiveness, this quote can illustrate the need for clarity in court rulings.
Teach your daughters, teach your granddaughters, everybody has to have something that they're good at where they can earn a living.
Women watch and say, 'I like watching you control your own space. It's motivated me to do better, to go back to college, to even try law school. My daughter's been watching you since she's 10 - I love the fact that she's watching a strong woman who's in control.' All of those things are good, positive things.
"Beauty fades," my father would tell me, "but dumb? Dumb is forever."
You don't teach morals and ethics and empathy and kindness in the schools. You teach that at home, and children learn by example.
I always say that when I see that needle start to go in the other direction, when people have had enough of me, I'm going to be smart enough to say goodbye. It's such a joyous ride to be on top, and it takes away from that ride if you sort of ride it down.
So we want to free the women of America? You know what would free the women of America? Make men accept responsibility for birth control.
The language of the law must not be foreign to the ears of those who are to obey it.
Litigation is the pursuit of practical ends, not a game of chess.
The language of the Constitution's guarantee of equal protection of the laws did not change between 1896 and 1954, and it would be very hard to say that the obvious facts on which 'Plessy' was based had changed.
Where the suspect poses no immediate threat to the officer and no threat to others, the harm resulting from the failing to apprehend him does not justify the use of deadly force to do so.
The constitution is either a superior paramount law, unchangeable by ordinary means, or it is on a level with ordinary legislative acts, alterable when the legislature shall please to alter it. It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. This is the very essence of judicial duty.
On the whole, we think of our consumers - other judges, lawyers, the public. The law that the Supreme Court establishes is the law that they must live by, so all things considered, it's better to have it clearer than confusing.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.