Look at almost any passage, and you'll find that a paragraph has five or six metaphors in it. It's not that the speaker is trying to be poetic, it's just that that's the way language works.
Steven PinkerRead
Purists behave as if there was a vintage year when language achieved a measure of excellence which we should all strive to maintain. In fact, there was never such a year. The language of Chaucer's or Shakespeare's time was no better and no worse than that of our own - just different.
Interpretation
Language evolves over time, and no single period can be considered the definitive standard of excellence.
Jean Aitchison's quote highlights the notion that language is dynamic and constantly changes rather than adhering to a fixed standard of 'excellence.' The idea that there was a perfect period in history when language peaked is a myth; language in the time of great writers like Chaucer and Shakespeare was simply different, not inherently superior or inferior to contemporary language.
In practice
In a discussion about linguistic diversity, one might refer to Aitchison's quote to argue against prescriptive norms.
Look at almost any passage, and you'll find that a paragraph has five or six metaphors in it. It's not that the speaker is trying to be poetic, it's just that that's the way language works.
People are under the impression that dictionaries legislate language. What a dictionary does is keep track of usages over time.
Every language is a world. Without translation, we would inhabit parishes bordering on silence.
Slang is a language that rolls up its sleeves, spits on its hands and goes to work.
French is the language that turns dirt into romance.
I have every reason to believe that an individual man or woman fluent in several tongues seduces, possesses, remembers differently according to his or her use of the relevant language.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.