One thing, however, I know with certainty: violence, or the direct threat of violence, of the kind we have seen in the past few days, is totally unjustified as a response to any published word or image.
That said, the question remains: how to strike the balance between free speech and mutual respect in this mixed-up world, both blessed and cursed with instant communication? We should not fight fire with fire, threats with threats.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote addresses the challenge of balancing free speech with respect for others in a world dominated by rapid communication.
In the context of our modern society, where communication occurs instantly and widely, the quote emphasizes the importance of finding a middle ground between exercising the right to free speech and maintaining mutual respect. It suggests that responding to hostility with hostility only escalates conflicts and implies that a more thoughtful, respectful approach is needed to navigate disagreements and differing opinions.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
During a panel discussion on civil discourse, one might invoke this quote to emphasize the need for respectful dialogue.
More from Timothy Garton Ash
All quotes →Developments in information technology and globalised media mean that the most powerful military in the history of the world can lose a war, not on the battlefield of dust and blood, but on the battlefield of world opinion.
Similar quotes
What you yourself hate, don't do to your neighbor. This is the whole law; the rest is commentary. Go and study.
Thinking of the stars night after night I begin to realize 'The stars are words' and all the innumerable worlds in the Milky Way are words, and so is this world too. And I realize that no matter where I am, whether in a little room full of thought, or in this endless universe of stars and mountains, it’s all in my mind.
What was hard to suffer is sweet to remember.
Your name or your body, what is dearer? Your body or your wealth, what is worthier?
I understood . . . that those who desired salvation should act like the trustee who, though having control over great possessions, regards not an iota of them as his own.
A god who is capable of sending intelligible signals to millions of people simultaneously, and of receiving messages from all of them simultaneously, cannot be, whatever else he might be, simple. Such Bandwidth!