There is no plausible theory under which the record of the Pentagon Papers can be interpreted as relating to the national defense.
There is no reason to accept the doctrines crafted to sustain power and privilege, or to believe that we are constrained by mysterious and unknown social laws. These are simply decisions made within institutions that are subject to human will and that must face the test of legitimacy. And if they do not meet the test, they can be replaced by other institutions that are more free and more just, as has happened often in the past.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote emphasizes that social structures are human-made and can be changed if they don't serve justice and freedom.
Noam Chomsky argues that societal doctrines which uphold power and privilege are not inherent truths but rather constructs of human decision-making. He encourages skepticism towards these constructs, asserting that if they fail to promote legitimacy and justice, they can—and should—be replaced with better systems that prioritize freedom and fairness. This perspective is deeply rooted in the belief that people have the agency to influence and change their institutions, reflecting a commitment to social justice and democratic values.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
This quote can be used in a speech about social justice initiatives.
More from Noam Chomsky
All quotes →The 'free-floating intellectual' may occupy himself with problems because of their inherent interest and importance, perhaps to little effect.
If you're teaching today what you were teaching five years ago, either the field is dead or you are.
There are very few people who are going to look into the mirror and say, 'That person I see is a savage monster;' instead, they make up some construction that justifies what they do.
The Republican Party has become overwhelmingly so extreme that it's hardly a traditional political party anymore.
There is still much debate about whether torture has been effective in eliciting information - the assumption being, apparently, that if it is effective, then it may be justified.
Similar quotes
I am opposed to looking upon logic as a kind of game. ... One might think that it is a matter of choice or convention which logic one adopts. I disagree with this view.
Why did we become blind, I don't know, perhaps one day we'll find out, Do you want me to tell you what I think, Yes, do, I don't think we did go blind, I think we are blind, Blind but seeing, Blind people who can see, but do not see.
So long as they (the Proles) continued to work and breed, their other activities were without importance. Left to themselves, like cattle turned loose upon the plains of Argentina, they had reverted to a style of life that appeared to be natural to them, a sort of ancestral pattern...Heavy physical work, the care of home and children, petty quarrels with neighbors, films, football, beer and above all, gambling filled up the horizon of their minds. To keep them in control was not difficult.
About sacrifice and the offering of sacrifices, sacrificial animals think quite differently from those who look on: but they have never been allowed to have their say.
Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do and what is right to do.
War and drink are the two things man is never too poor to buy.