Has there ever been a society which has died of dissent? Several have died of conformity in our lifetime.
Jacob BronowskiRead
No science is immune to the infection of politics and the corruption of power. ... The time has come to consider how we might bring about a separation, as complete as possible, between Science and Government in all countries. I call this the disestablishment of science, in the same sense in which the churches have been disestablished and have become independent of the state.
Interpretation
Science is influenced by politics and power, and a separation between the two is necessary.
In this quote, Jacob Bronowski emphasizes the inherent conflicts that arise when science is subjected to political influence and manipulation. He advocates for a structural separation between scientific endeavors and governmental controls, comparing this need to the historical disestablishment of religious institutions from state power, suggesting that such independence is vital for the integrity and progress of science as a discipline.
In practice
In a discussion on the importance of unbiased scientific research during a conference.
Has there ever been a society which has died of dissent? Several have died of conformity in our lifetime.
There is no absolute knowledge. And those who claim it, whether they are scientists or dogmatists, open the door to tragedy.
To me the most interesting thing about man is that he is an animal who practices art and science and in every known society practices both together.
A man becomes creative, whether he is an artist or scientist, when he finds a new unity in the variety of nature. He does so by finding a likeness between things which were not thought alike before.
The values by which we are to survive are not rules for just and unjust conduct, but are those deeper illuminations in whose light justice and injustice, good and evil, means and ends are seen in fearful sharpness of outline.
The basis for poetry and scientific discovery is the ability to comprehend the unlike in the like and the like in the unlike.
I think the question is, are there women and have there been women who want to do science and could be doing great science, but they never really got the opportunity?
I suppose the one quality in an astronaut more powerful than any other is curiosity. They have to get some place nobody's ever been.
I called it ignose, not knowing which carbohydrate it was. This name was turned down by my editor. 'God-nose' was not more successful, so in the end 'hexuronic acid' was agreed upon. To-day the substance is called 'ascorbic acid' and I will use this name.
You know, entropy is associated thermodynamically, in systems involving heat, with disorder. And in an analogous way, information is associated with disorder, which seems paradoxical. But when you think about it, a bit of information is a surprise. If you already knew what the message contained, there would be no new information in it.
No educated person believes the Adam and Eve myth nowadays, but it's surprising how many parents think that it's somehow fun to pass on this falsehood to their children...I would want to argue that the truth of evolution is more interesting and more poetic
Still, it is an error to argue in front of your data. You find yourself insensibly twisting them round to fit your theories.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.