Has there ever been a society which has died of dissent? Several have died of conformity in our lifetime.
Jacob BronowskiRead
No science is immune to the infection of politics and the corruption of power. ... The time has come to consider how we might bring about a separation, as complete as possible, between Science and Government in all countries. I call this the disestablishment of science, in the same sense in which the churches have been disestablished and have become independent of the state.
Interpretation
Science is influenced by politics and power, and a separation between the two is necessary.
In this quote, Jacob Bronowski emphasizes the inherent conflicts that arise when science is subjected to political influence and manipulation. He advocates for a structural separation between scientific endeavors and governmental controls, comparing this need to the historical disestablishment of religious institutions from state power, suggesting that such independence is vital for the integrity and progress of science as a discipline.
In practice
In a discussion on the importance of unbiased scientific research during a conference.
Has there ever been a society which has died of dissent? Several have died of conformity in our lifetime.
There is no absolute knowledge. And those who claim it, whether they are scientists or dogmatists, open the door to tragedy.
To me the most interesting thing about man is that he is an animal who practices art and science and in every known society practices both together.
A man becomes creative, whether he is an artist or scientist, when he finds a new unity in the variety of nature. He does so by finding a likeness between things which were not thought alike before.
The values by which we are to survive are not rules for just and unjust conduct, but are those deeper illuminations in whose light justice and injustice, good and evil, means and ends are seen in fearful sharpness of outline.
The basis for poetry and scientific discovery is the ability to comprehend the unlike in the like and the like in the unlike.
Does anyone believe that the difference between the Lebesgue and Riemann integrals can have physical significance, and that whether say, an airplane would or would not fly could depend on this difference? If such were claimed, I should not care to fly in that plane.
although science could pinpoint the exact spot in the brain that ignites rage, they had yet to identify the location that produces love.
When I began in 1960, individuality wasn't an accepted thing to look for; it was about species-specific behaviour. But animal behaviour is not hard science. There's room for intuition.
It will be another million years, at least, before we understand the primes.
In physics, your solution should convince a reasonable person. In math, you have to convince a person who's trying to make trouble. Ultimately, in physics, you're hoping to convince Nature. And I've found Nature to be pretty reasonable.
As a true scientist, I have been proved wrong so many times that I'm very humble.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.