Confusion of sign and object is original sin coeval with the word.
Willard Van Orman QuineRead
Science is not a substitute for common sense, but an extension of it.
Interpretation
Science enhances our understanding but should complement rather than replace common sense.
This quote by Willard Van Orman Quine suggests that while science is an essential tool for exploring and understanding the world, it cannot replace the innate understanding and practical judgment that come from common sense. It emphasizes the importance of integrating scientific knowledge with practical wisdom in decision-making and daily life.
In practice
During a lecture on critical thinking, a teacher could use this quote to emphasize the importance of relying on both scientific evidence and common sense.
Confusion of sign and object is original sin coeval with the word.
It is one of the consolations of philosophy that the benefit of showing how to dispense with a concept does not hinge on dispensing with it.
For me the problem of induction is a problem about the world: a problem of how we, as we are now (by our present scientific lights), in a world we never made, should stand better than random, or coin-tossing chances changes of coming out right when we predict by inductions. . . .
Language is conceived in sin and science is its redemption.
Meaning is what essence becomes when it is divorced from the object of reference and wedded to the word.
Creatures inveterately wrong in their inductions have a pathetic but praise-worthy tendency to die before reproducing their kind.
I think the reason people are dealing with science less well now than 50 years ago is that it has become so complicated.
A review of seventy-four clinical trials of antidepressants, for example, found that thirty-seven of thirty-eight positive studies [that praised the drugs] were published. But of the thirty-six negative studies, thirty-three were either not published or published in a form that conveyed a positive outcome.
The first mission to Mars did not expect to find craters and river valleys, and yet they did. The first mission to Jupiter didn't expect to find ocean worlds and volcano worlds, but they did.
By the way, were we to find life-forms on Venus, we would probably call them Venutians, just as people from Mars would be Martians. But according to rules of Latin genitives, to be βof Venusβ ought to make you a Venereal. Unfortunately, medical doctors reached that word before astronomers did. Canβt blame them, I suppose. Venereal disease long predates astronomy, which itself stands as only the second oldest profession.
The fundamental principle of science, the definition almost, is this: the _x000D_ sole test of the validity of any idea is experiment.
How long have we got? We have to stabilize emissions of carbon dioxide within a decade, or temperatures will warm by more than one degree... We don't have much time left.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.