If a given scientist had not made a given discovery, someone else would have done so a little later. Johann Mendel dies unknown after having discovered the laws of heredity: thirty-five years later, three men rediscover them. But the book that is not written will never be written. The premature death of a great scientist delays humanity; that of a great writer deprives it.
When a scientist is ahead of his times, it is often through misunderstanding of current, rather than intuition of future truth. In science there is never any error so gross that it won't one day, from some perspective, appear prophetic.
Interpretation
What this quote means
This quote highlights how scientists are often misinterpreted in their time, and their ideas may seem erroneous until future developments validate them.
Jean Rostand emphasizes that innovative scientific ideas may be misunderstood in their own time, reflecting more of a contemporary misunderstanding rather than an actual error of intuition about future truths. He suggests that what appears to be incorrect or speculative today could later be recognized as visionary. This perspective invites us to appreciate the complexity of scientific progress and the role of societal context in shaping our understanding of truth.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a lecture about scientific theories, you could use this quote to illustrate how groundbreaking ideas are often misunderstood.
More from Jean Rostand
All quotes →Certain brief sentences are peerless in their ability to give one the feeling that nothing remains to be said.
My pessimism extends to the point of even suspecting the sincerity of other pessimists.
We spend our time envying people whom we wouldn't wish to be.
Stupidity, outrage, vanity, cruelty, iniquity, bad faith, falsehood - we fail to see the whole array when it is facing in the same direction as we.
A few great minds are enough to endow humanity with monstrous power, but a few great hearts are not enough to make us worthy of using it.
Similar quotes
The most important tool of the theoretical physicist is his wastebasket.
Based on the science, you can make somewhat clear statements: The number of people who can survive on six hours of sleep without impairment is zero.
At the last dim horizon, we search among ghostly errors of observations for landmarks that are scarcely more substantial. The search will continue. The urge is older than history. It is not satisfied and it will not be oppressed.
Yes. I'm a doctor, an epidemiologist, and lots of my professional colleagues flip back and forth between industry and medical roles. I know them; they are not bad people. But it is possible for good people in bad systems to do things that inflict enormous harm.
We can invent as many theories we like, and any one of them can be made to fit the facts. But that theory is always preferred which makes the fewest number of assumptions.
I just felt that space was the next thing coming in aviation. It was higher, faster. It had the risk.