Certain brief sentences are peerless in their ability to give one the feeling that nothing remains to be said.
If a given scientist had not made a given discovery, someone else would have done so a little later. Johann Mendel dies unknown after having discovered the laws of heredity: thirty-five years later, three men rediscover them. But the book that is not written will never be written. The premature death of a great scientist delays humanity; that of a great writer deprives it.
Interpretation
What this quote means
Scientific discoveries are often re-discovered, but unwritten literature is lost forever.
This quote emphasizes the idea that scientific ideas, while significant, can eventually be uncovered by others, thereby ensuring the continuation of knowledge. In contrast, the death of a writer who has potential insights or stories to share results in a permanent loss to humanity, as their unique contributions will remain unwritten and unshared, highlighting the importance of creative expression alongside scientific advancement.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a seminar on the importance of scientific research, one might use this quote to illustrate the impact of individual contributions to collective knowledge.
More from Jean Rostand
All quotes βMy pessimism extends to the point of even suspecting the sincerity of other pessimists.
We spend our time envying people whom we wouldn't wish to be.
Stupidity, outrage, vanity, cruelty, iniquity, bad faith, falsehood - we fail to see the whole array when it is facing in the same direction as we.
When a scientist is ahead of his times, it is often through misunderstanding of current, rather than intuition of future truth. In science there is never any error so gross that it won't one day, from some perspective, appear prophetic.
A few great minds are enough to endow humanity with monstrous power, but a few great hearts are not enough to make us worthy of using it.
Similar quotes
I'm substantially concerned about the policy directions of the space agency. We have a situation in the U.S. where the White House and Congress are at odds over what the future direction should be. They're sort of playing a game and NASA is the shuttlecock that they're hitting back and forth.
The solar system should be viewed as our backyard, not as some sequence of destinations that we do one at a time.
If Mars formed life, then life on Earth could have been seeded by life on Mars, making every life form on Earth descended from Martians.
[In mathematics] There are two kinds of mistakes. There are fatal mistakes that destroy a theory, but there are also contingent ones, which are useful in testing the stability of a theory.
Natural gas emits only half the carbon dioxide of coal when burned, but if methane leaks when oil companies extract it from the ground in a sloppy manner - methane is far more potent a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide - it can wipe out all the advantages of natural gas over coal.
If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.