There is no plausible theory under which the record of the Pentagon Papers can be interpreted as relating to the national defense.
Spaniards were condemned for appeasing terrorism by voting for withdrawing troops from Iraq in the absence of U.N. authorization - that is, for taking a stand rather like that of 70 percent of Americans, who called for the U.N. to take the leading role in Iraq.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote critiques the response to terrorism and questions the justification of political decisions based on public opinion.
Noam Chomsky highlights a moral and philosophical dilemma regarding the actions taken by governments in response to terrorism. He argues that the criticism directed at Spaniards for their decision to withdraw troops from Iraq reflects a broader inconsistency in moral judgment, as a significant portion of Americans shared similar views advocating for U.N. involvement. This underscores the complexities of political decisions influenced by public sentiment and the ethical considerations behind them.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
During a debate on military intervention, one might quote Chomsky to illustrate the importance of public opinion in foreign policy.
More from Noam Chomsky
All quotes →The 'free-floating intellectual' may occupy himself with problems because of their inherent interest and importance, perhaps to little effect.
If you're teaching today what you were teaching five years ago, either the field is dead or you are.
There are very few people who are going to look into the mirror and say, 'That person I see is a savage monster;' instead, they make up some construction that justifies what they do.
The Republican Party has become overwhelmingly so extreme that it's hardly a traditional political party anymore.
There is still much debate about whether torture has been effective in eliciting information - the assumption being, apparently, that if it is effective, then it may be justified.
Similar quotes
The interviewer should just tell me the words he wants me to say and I’ll repeat them after him. I think that would be so great because I’m so empty I just can’t think of anything to say.
We want a society in which we are free to make choices, to make mistakes, to be generous and compassionate. That is what we mean by a moral society - not a society in which the State is responsible for everything, and no one is responsible for the State.
God promised to make you free. He never promised to make you independent.
No doubt many people have the feeling that to talk about death at all is, in effect, to conjure it up mentally, to bring it closer in such a way that one has to face up to the inevitability of one's own eventual demise. So, to spare ourselves this psychological trauma, we decide just to try to avoid the topic as much as possible.
Now see that noble and most sovereign reason, Like sweet bells jangled, out of tune and harsh.
Some tell me Preach the pure gospel! This reminds me that the Communist secret police also told me to preach Christ, but not to mention communism. Is it really so, that those who are for what is called a pure gospel are inspired by the same spirit as those of the Communist secret police?