I try to be good but sometimes a person just has to break out and act like the wild and springy thing one used to be. It's impossible not to remember wild an want it back.
Mary OliverRead
At the time I was growing up, literature was involved with the so-called confessional poets. And I was not interested in that. I did not think that specific and personal perspective functioned well for the reader at all.
Interpretation
Mary Oliver expresses her belief that confessional poetry may not resonate with readers due to its personal nature.
In this quote, Mary Oliver reflects on her formative years in literature, specifically addressing the trend of confessional poetry that focuses on personal experiences. She suggests that such an approach may not serve the reader effectively, implying that literature should strive for broader, more universal themes rather than overly intimate perspectives that might alienate the audience.
In practice
In a speech about the role of personal experiences in writing, you might quote Mary Oliver to emphasize a broader connection with audiences.
I try to be good but sometimes a person just has to break out and act like the wild and springy thing one used to be. It's impossible not to remember wild an want it back.
I know the sag of the unfinished poem. And I know the release of the poem that is finished.
For poems are not words, after all, but fires for the cold, ropes let down to the lost, something as necessary as bread in the pockets of the hungry.
If I have any lasting worth, it will be because I have tried to make people remember what the Earth is meant to look like.
Every day I see or hear something that more or less kills me with delight, that leaves me like a needle in the haystack of light.
The god of dirt came up to me many times and said so many wise and delectable things, I lay on the grass listening to his dog voice, frog voice; now, he said, and now, and never once mentioned forever from, One or Two Things
There are books so alive that you're always afraid that while you weren't reading, the book has gone and changed, has shifted like a river; while you went on living, it went on living too, and like a river moved on and moved away. No one has stepped twice into the same river. But did anyone ever step twice into the same book?
I think that an author who speaks about his own books is almost as bad as a mother who talks about her own children.
If certain books are to be termed 'immigrant fiction,' what do we call the rest? Native fiction? Puritan fiction? This distinction doesn't agree with me.
The problem with literature, with writing, is that it works sometimes in terms of correction of social ills. Other times, it just does not suffice.
Writers are often the worst judges of what they have written.
I think the job of writing and literature is to encourage each one of us to believe that we're living in a story.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.