Civilization is first of all a moral thing. Without truth, respect for duty, love of neighbor, and virtue, everything is destroyed. The morality of a society is alone the basis of civilization.
Henri Frederic AmielRead
[I]t is truth alone-scientific, established, proved, and rational truth-which is capable of satisfying nowadays the awakened minds of all classes. We may still say perhaps, 'faith governs the world,'-but the faith of the present is no longer in revelation or in the priest-it is in reason and in science.
Interpretation
This quote emphasizes the importance of truth, reason, and science over faith in religious or traditional beliefs.
Henri Frederic Amiel argues that in modern times, the quest for knowledge and understanding relies on empirical truths proven by science, rather than on faith or religious revelation. He suggests that while faith has historically been a guiding principle for humanity, the contemporary world demands a reliance on reason and scientific evidence to satisfy an increasingly enlightened populace.
In practice
In a debate on the importance of science education, this quote serves to highlight the necessity of grounding our understanding in empirical evidence.
Civilization is first of all a moral thing. Without truth, respect for duty, love of neighbor, and virtue, everything is destroyed. The morality of a society is alone the basis of civilization.
Man never knows what he wants; he aspires to penetrate mysteries and as soon as he has, wants to re-establish them. Ignorance irritates him and knowledge cloys.
Truth is not only violated by falsehood; it may be equally outraged by silence.
Any landscape is a condition of the spirit.
True love is that which ennobles the personality, fortifies the heart, and sanctifies the existence.
It is by teaching that we teach ourselves, by relating that we observe, by affirming that we examine, by showing that we look, by writing that we think, by pumping that we draw water into the well.
This is one of those cases in which the imagination is baffled by the facts.
Being African didn't mean anything to me until later in my life.
I soon began to sense a fundamental perceptual difficulty among male scholars (and some female ones) for which 'sexism' is too facile a term. It is really an intellectual defect, which might be termed 'patrivincialism' or patrochialism': the assumption that women are a subgroup, that men's culture is the 'real' world, that patriarchy is equivalent to culture and culture to patriarchy, that the 'great' or 'liberalizing' periods of history have been the same for women as for men.
The victor is not victorious if the vanquished does not consider himself so
Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands?
Your "if" is the only peacemaker; much virtue in "if.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.