There is no plausible theory under which the record of the Pentagon Papers can be interpreted as relating to the national defense.
The U.S. - the idea that the U.S. has introduced and imposed principles of international law, that's hardly even a joke. The United States has even gone so far as to veto Security Council resolutions calling on all states to observe international law. That was in the 1980s under Reagan.
Interpretation
What this quote means
This quote criticizes the hypocrisy of the U.S. in enforcing international law while ignoring it itself.
Noam Chomsky highlights a contradiction in U.S. foreign policy, particularly in the context of international law. He points out that while the U.S. claims to uphold and promote international legal standards, it has selectively applied these principles, often vetoing actions that could hold it accountable or call for adherence to these laws, particularly during the Reagan era. This statement suggests a deeper reflection on the moral authority of nations when they act inconsistently with the principles they advocate.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a debate on international relations, this quote could be used to discuss the responsibilities of powerful nations.
More from Noam Chomsky
All quotes →The 'free-floating intellectual' may occupy himself with problems because of their inherent interest and importance, perhaps to little effect.
If you're teaching today what you were teaching five years ago, either the field is dead or you are.
There are very few people who are going to look into the mirror and say, 'That person I see is a savage monster;' instead, they make up some construction that justifies what they do.
The Republican Party has become overwhelmingly so extreme that it's hardly a traditional political party anymore.
There is still much debate about whether torture has been effective in eliciting information - the assumption being, apparently, that if it is effective, then it may be justified.
Similar quotes
That is why Bias jested with those who were going through the perils of a great storm with him and calling on the gods for help: "Shut up," he said, "so that they do not realize that you are here with me.
I have no faith in human perfectability. I think that human exertion will have no appreciable effect upon humanity. Man is now only more active - not more happy - nor more wise, than he was 6000 years ago.
The person who forgets the ultimate is a slave to the immediate.
Near the gates and within two cities there will be scourges the like of which was never seen: famine within plague, people put out by steel, crying to the great immortal God for relief.
History is always best written generations after the event, when clouded fact and memory have all fused into what can be accepted as truth, whether it be so or not.
There ought not be two histories, one of political and moral action and one of political and moral theorizing, because there were not two pasts, one populated only by actions, the other only by theories. Every action is the bearer and expression of more or less theory-laden beliefs and concepts; every piece of theorizing and every expression of belief is a politcal and moral action.