There is no plausible theory under which the record of the Pentagon Papers can be interpreted as relating to the national defense.
The U.S. - the idea that the U.S. has introduced and imposed principles of international law, that's hardly even a joke. The United States has even gone so far as to veto Security Council resolutions calling on all states to observe international law. That was in the 1980s under Reagan.
Interpretation
What this quote means
This quote criticizes the hypocrisy of the U.S. in enforcing international law while ignoring it itself.
Noam Chomsky highlights a contradiction in U.S. foreign policy, particularly in the context of international law. He points out that while the U.S. claims to uphold and promote international legal standards, it has selectively applied these principles, often vetoing actions that could hold it accountable or call for adherence to these laws, particularly during the Reagan era. This statement suggests a deeper reflection on the moral authority of nations when they act inconsistently with the principles they advocate.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a debate on international relations, this quote could be used to discuss the responsibilities of powerful nations.
More from Noam Chomsky
All quotes →The 'free-floating intellectual' may occupy himself with problems because of their inherent interest and importance, perhaps to little effect.
If you're teaching today what you were teaching five years ago, either the field is dead or you are.
There are very few people who are going to look into the mirror and say, 'That person I see is a savage monster;' instead, they make up some construction that justifies what they do.
The Republican Party has become overwhelmingly so extreme that it's hardly a traditional political party anymore.
There is still much debate about whether torture has been effective in eliciting information - the assumption being, apparently, that if it is effective, then it may be justified.
Similar quotes
What you don't understand is that it is possible to be an atheist, it is possible not to know if God exists or why He should, and yet to believe that man does not live in a state of nature but in history, and that history as we know it now began with Christ, it was founded by Him on the Gospels.
The world is not dialectical - it is sworn to extremes, not to equilibrium, sworn to radical antagonism, not to reconciliation or synthesis. This is also the principle of evil.
If language is lost, humanity is lost. If writing is lost, certain kinds of civilization and society are lost, but many other kinds remain - and there is no reason to think that those alternatives are inferior.
And through the spaces of the dark Midnight shakes the memory As a madman shakes a dead geranium.
How can we live in harmony? First we need to know we are all madly in love with the same God.
We are not meant to be perfect; we are meant to be whole