There is no plausible theory under which the record of the Pentagon Papers can be interpreted as relating to the national defense.
From the U.S. point of view, negotiations are, in effect, a way for Israel to continue its policies of systematically taking over whatever it wants in the West Bank, maintaining the brutal siege on Gaza, separating Gaza from the West Bank and, of course, occupying the Syrian Golan heights, all with full U.S. support.
Interpretation
What this quote means
Chomsky argues that U.S. negotiations enable Israel's aggressive policies in the region.
In this quote, Noam Chomsky critiques U.S. foreign policy regarding Israel and Palestine, suggesting that negotiations are not genuine attempts at peace but rather mechanisms that allow Israel to continue its territorial expansion and military operations in Palestinian territories and the Golan Heights. He highlights the complex relationship between the U.S. and Israel, implying that U.S. support indirectly endorses the ongoing violence and occupation in the region.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
During a debate on foreign policy, one could cite this quote to highlight the implications of U.S. support for Israel.
More from Noam Chomsky
All quotes →The 'free-floating intellectual' may occupy himself with problems because of their inherent interest and importance, perhaps to little effect.
If you're teaching today what you were teaching five years ago, either the field is dead or you are.
There are very few people who are going to look into the mirror and say, 'That person I see is a savage monster;' instead, they make up some construction that justifies what they do.
The Republican Party has become overwhelmingly so extreme that it's hardly a traditional political party anymore.
There is still much debate about whether torture has been effective in eliciting information - the assumption being, apparently, that if it is effective, then it may be justified.
Similar quotes
I have an idea about voting, how about on every ballot we include "None of the above". People may laugh at that, but what that is, it is a vote of no confidence in your government and I'm willing to bet that in some elections, 'None of the Above' would win. Imagine if you won the election but lost to 'None of the Above'. Wouldn't that make you re-think your positions?
Our most dangerous tendency is to expect too much of government, and at the same time do for it too little. . . . We must strive for normalcy to reach stability.
If you do politics the right way, I believe, you can actually make people's lives better. And integrity is the minimum ante to get into the game.
Big corporations have money and power to make sure every rule breaks their way; people have voices and votes to push back.
Our American friends offer us money, arms, and advice. We take the money, we take the arms, and we decline the advice.
Let's be clear: Voter suppression is real.