There is no plausible theory under which the record of the Pentagon Papers can be interpreted as relating to the national defense.
If voting could actually change anything, it would be illegal.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote suggests that voting is ineffective for real change and implies that those in power prefer it to remain so.
Noam Chomsky's quote highlights a cynical perspective on the political system, where he suggests that the act of voting, while seemingly a democratic process, does not lead to substantial changes in power dynamics. The implication is that if voting truly had the power to challenge the status quo, those in control would prevent it, indicating a deep skepticism towards the effectiveness of electoral participation in creating meaningful reform or justice.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a discussion about the effectiveness of political participation, one might quote Chomsky to argue that voting alone won't bring about real societal transformation.
More from Noam Chomsky
All quotes →The 'free-floating intellectual' may occupy himself with problems because of their inherent interest and importance, perhaps to little effect.
If you're teaching today what you were teaching five years ago, either the field is dead or you are.
There are very few people who are going to look into the mirror and say, 'That person I see is a savage monster;' instead, they make up some construction that justifies what they do.
The Republican Party has become overwhelmingly so extreme that it's hardly a traditional political party anymore.
There is still much debate about whether torture has been effective in eliciting information - the assumption being, apparently, that if it is effective, then it may be justified.
Similar quotes
Men who sincerely abhorred the word Communism in the pursuit of common ends found that they were unable to distinguish Communists from themselves…. For men who could not see that what they firmly believed was liberalism added up to socialism could scarcely be expected to see what added up to Communism. Any charge of Communism enraged them precisely because they could not grasp the differences between themselves and those against whom it was made.
Political reform need not go hand in hand with economic liberalization.. I hold unconventional views about this.. I do not believe if you are a libertarian, full of diverse opinions, full of competing ideas in the market place, full of sound and fury, therefore you will succeed.
We have to build a political consensus and that requires people to give up a little bit of their own ... in order to create this common ground.
Neither the United States nor Israel has the capacity to impose a unilateral solution in the Middle East.
Collecting more taxes than is absolutely necessary is legalized robbery.
You know, one of the things my husband says when people say 'Well, what did you bring to Washington,' he said, 'Well, I brought arithmetic.'