No one may have the guts to say this, but if we could make better human beings by knowing how to add genes, why shouldn't we?
I would only once have the opportunity to let my scientific career encompass a path from the double helix to the three billion steps of the human genome.
Interpretation
What this quote means
James D. Watson reflects on his unique journey in genetics from the discovery of DNA's structure to mapping the human genome.
In this quote, James D. Watson expresses the importance and uniqueness of his scientific career, where he made significant contributions to genetics, specifically from his pivotal role in discovering the double helix structure of DNA to participating in the monumental Human Genome Project, which mapped the entire human genome. This journey highlights the interconnectedness of fundamental scientific discoveries and their implications for understanding human biology and disease.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a lecture about genetics, one could use this quote to emphasize the importance of scientific innovation.
More from James D. Watson
All quotes βI think the reason people are dealing with science less well now than 50 years ago is that it has become so complicated.
Polls consistently show that the majority of Americans favour research using embryonic stem cells and yet politicians continue to pander to the outspoken religious minority that is hampering efforts to develop this potentially valuable technology.
DNA was my only gold rush. I regarded DNA as worth a gold rush.
Science has always been my preoccupation and when you think a breakthrough is possible, it is terribly exciting.
If you go into science, I think you better go in with a dream that maybe you, too, will get a Nobel Prize. It's not that I went in and I thought I was very bright and I was going to get one, but I'll confess, you know, I knew what it was.
Similar quotes
Science reserves the highest reward for those of you who disprove our most cherished beliefs. At any moment someone from any walk of life could come forward and be responsible for a complete revision of our view of everything.
Scientific and technological progress themselves are value-neutral. They are just very good at doing what they do. If you want to do selfish, greedy, intolerant and violent things, scientific technology will provide you with by far the most efficient way of doing so. But if you want to do good, to solve the world's problems, to progress in the best value-laden sense, once again, there is no better means to those ends than the scientific way.
Scientists are peeping toms at the keyhole of eternity.
If others would but reflect on mathematical truths as deeply and as continuously as I have, they would make my discoveries.
My own experience of over 60 years in biomedical research amply demonstrated that without the use of animals and of human beings, it would have been impossible to acquire the important knowledge needed to prevent much suffering and premature death not only among humans but also among [other] animals.
The march of science and technology does not imply growing intellectual complexity in the lives of most people. It often means the opposite.