None are so old as those who have outlived enthusiasm.
If I knew for a certainty that a man was coming to my house with the conscious design of doing me good, I should run for my life.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote suggests a skepticism toward well-intentioned help, indicating that it may not always be beneficial or welcome.
Henry David Thoreau's quote reflects a deep skepticism about the motives behind kindness and assistance. It highlights the idea that someone coming with the intent to 'do good' can bring unwanted pressures or expectations, leading to a need for personal space and autonomy. Thoreau's perspective raises questions about the nature of help and suggests that sometimes it is better to rely on oneself rather than accept assistance that may not be genuinely in one's interest.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
This quote can be used in a discussion about personal boundaries at a self-help seminar.
More from Henry David Thoreau
All quotes βThrough want of enterprise and faith men are where they are, buying and selling and spending their lives like servants.
An early-morning walk is a blessing for the whole day.
Have no mean hours, but be grateful for every hour, and accept what it brings. The reality will make any sincere record respectable.
As every season seems best to us in its turn, so the coming in of spring is like the creation of Cosmos out of Chaos and the realization of the Golden Age.
That grand old poem called Winter
Similar quotes
Remember and understand well that where Peter is, there is the Church; that those who refuse to associate in communion with the Chair of Peter belong to Antichrist, not to Christ. He who would separate himself from the Roman Pontiff has no further bond with Christ.
If truth is the main casualty in war, ambiguity is another.
When we understand that man is the only animal who must create meaning, who must open a wedge into neutral nature, we already understand the essence of love. Love is the problem of an animal who must find life, create a dialogue with nature in order to experience his own being.
The disruptive powers of excessive national fecundity may have played a greater part in bursting the bonds of convention than either the power of ideas or the errors of autocracy.
If the militarily most powerful and least threatened states need nuclear weapons for their security, how can one deny such security to countries that are truly insecure? The present nuclear policy is a recipe for proliferation. It is a policy for disaster.
Today there were fear, hatred, and pain, but no dignity of emotion, no deep or complex sorrows.