When will Labour learn that you cannot build Jerusalem in Brussels.
Europe will never be like America. Europe is a product of history. America is a product of philosophy.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote contrasts Europeβs historical development with America's philosophical foundations.
Margaret Thatcher's quote emphasizes the fundamental differences between Europe and America, suggesting that Europe has been shaped by its historical events and cultural heritage, while America has been influenced more by philosophical ideas and principles. This assertion highlights the unique identities of both regions, where Europe's past is a driving force in its identity, whereas America's values stem from Enlightenment thinking and ideals of liberty and individualism.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a discussion about cultural differences, this quote can illustrate how history and philosophy shape societies.
More from Margaret Thatcher
All quotes βNever in the history of human credit has so much been owed.
The battle for women's rights has been largely won.
Ought we not to ask the media to agree among themselves a voluntary code of conduct, under which they would not say or show anything which could assist the terrorists' morale or their cause while the hijack lasted.
Israel must never be expected to jeopardize her security: if she was ever foolish enough to do so, and then suffered for it, the backlash against both honest brokers and Palestinians would be immense - 'land for peace' must also bring peace.
If it's me against 48, I feel sorry for the 48.
Similar quotes
The average Christian is so cold and so contented with His wretched condition that there is no vacuum of desire into which the blessed Spirit can rush in satisfying fullness.
The glory of God is a human being fully alive; and to be alive consists in beholding God.
So the single most vital step on your journey towards enlightenment is this: learn to disidentify from your mind.
The scrupulous and the just, the noble, humane, and devoted natures; the unselfish and the intelligent may begin a movement - but it passes away from them. They are not the leaders of a revolution. They are its victims.
Why do we take pleasure in gruesome death, neatly packaged as a puzzle to which we may find a satisfactory solution through clues - or if we are not clever enough, have it revealed by the all-powerful tale-teller at the end of the book? It is something to do with being reduced to, and comforted by, playing by the rules.
After all, if there is no class stratification in a society, it follows that there is no state, because the state arose as an instrument to be used by a particular class to control the rest of society in its own interests.