There is no plausible theory under which the record of the Pentagon Papers can be interpreted as relating to the national defense.
Noam ChomskyRead
Why does everyone take for granted that we don't learn to grow arms, but rather, are designed to grow arms? Similarly, we should conclude that in the case of the development of moral systems; there's a biological endowment which in effect requires us to develop a system of moral judgment and a theory of justice, if you like, that in fact has detailed applicability over an enormous range.
Interpretation
The quote suggests that moral systems are inherent to our nature, similar to physical attributes like arms.
Noam Chomsky emphasizes that just as humans are biologically designed to develop physical traits like arms, there is also an innate biological foundation for the development of moral judgments and systems of justice. This perspective highlights that moral reasoning is not merely a social construct but has deep evolutionary roots that apply across various contexts in human society.
In practice
During a philosophical debate discussing the origins of morality.
There is no plausible theory under which the record of the Pentagon Papers can be interpreted as relating to the national defense.
The 'free-floating intellectual' may occupy himself with problems because of their inherent interest and importance, perhaps to little effect.
If you're teaching today what you were teaching five years ago, either the field is dead or you are.
There are very few people who are going to look into the mirror and say, 'That person I see is a savage monster;' instead, they make up some construction that justifies what they do.
The Republican Party has become overwhelmingly so extreme that it's hardly a traditional political party anymore.
There is still much debate about whether torture has been effective in eliciting information - the assumption being, apparently, that if it is effective, then it may be justified.
By repenting, one acknowledges them as sins-therefore not to be repeated.
I believe that the time given to refutation in philosophy is usually time lost. Of the many attacks directed by many thinkers against each other, what now remains? Nothing, or assuredly very little. That which counts and endures is the modicum of positive truth which each contributes. The true statement is, of itself, able to displace the erroneous idea, and becomes, without our having taken the trouble of refuting anyone, the best of refutations.
The truth often sounds paradoxical.
The pencil of the Holy Ghost hath labored more in describing the afflictions of Job than the felicities of Solomon.
I believe in the separation of church and state and would not use my authority to violate this principle in any way.
An evil-speaker differs from an evil-doer only in the want of opportunity.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.