Everywhere you look for comparisons of life under anarchy and life under government, life under government is less violent.
Interpretation
This quote suggests that government plays a crucial role in reducing violence compared to anarchy.
Steven Pinker argues that when comparing life under anarchy to life under government, the latter is characterized by significantly lower levels of violence. This highlights the importance of governmental structures and laws in maintaining societal order and safety, implying that without such frameworks, chaos and violence are more likely to prevail.
In practice
This quote can be used in a debate about the effectiveness of government in ensuring public safety.
The foundation of individual rights is the assumption that people have wants and needs and are authorities on what those wants and needs are. If people's stated desires were just some kind of erasable inscription or reprogrammable brainwashing, any atrocity could be justified.
The linguistic clumsiness of tourists and students might be the price we pay for the linguistic genius we displayed as babies, just as the decrepitude of age in the price we pay for the vigor of youth.
If we are not to abandon values such as peace and equality, or our commitments to science and truth, then we must pry these values away from claims about our psychological makeup that are vulnerable to being proven false.
We adults protect ourselves with laws, police, workplace regulations and social norms and there is no conceivable reason why children should be left more vulnerable, other that laziness or callousness in considering what life is like from their point of view.
The idea that children are passive repositories to be shaped by their parents has been massively overstated. A child's peer group is a far greater determinant of its development and achievements than parental aspiration.
Reason is non-negotiable. Try to argue against it, or to exclude it from some realm of knowledge, and you've already lost the argument, because you're using reason to make your case. ... We don't "believe" in reason.
Death does not trouble me. I have no fear of supernatural punishments, of course, nor could I enjoy an eternal life in which there would be nothing left for me to do, the task of living having been accomplished.
When we are planning for posterity, we ought to remember that virtue is not hereditary.
It is one of the superstitions of the human mind to have imagined that virginity could be a virtue.
Your genuine action will explain itself, and_x000D_ _x000D_ will explain your other genuine actions._x000D_ _x000D_ Your conformity explains nothing.
I am not a mechanism, an assembly of various sections. and it is not because the mechanism is working wrongly, that I am ill. I am ill because of wounds to the soul, to the deep emotional self, and the wounds to the soul take a long, long time, only time can help and patience, and a certain difficult repentance long difficult repentance, realization of lifeβs mistake, and the freeing oneself from the endless repetition of the mistake which mankind at large has chosen to sanctify.
If globalization is to realise its potential as a force for good, we have to look more closely at the means by which we handle our growing interdependence. We do not have a world government, but we do have an increasingly complex network of institutions that are concerned with global governance. They are central to our future and international human rights law
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.