Freedom only for supporters of the government, only for the members of one party - however numerous they may be - is no freedom at all. Freedom is always and exclusively freedom for the one who thinks differently. Not because of any fanatical concept of 'justice' but because all that is instructive, wholesome and purifying in political freedom depends on this essential characteristic, and its effectiveness vanishes when 'freedom' becomes a special privilege.
Interpretation
True freedom requires allowing diverse opinions and thoughts to exist, not just those that align with the majority.
Rosa Luxemburg emphasizes that genuine freedom cannot be limited to those who support the government or belong to a particular party, regardless of their numbers. Instead, it is defined by the ability to think differently and openly express dissenting opinions. This notion underscores that the value of political freedom is rooted in its inclusivity; when freedom becomes a privilege reserved for a select few, its true purpose and benefits diminish, highlighting the essential nature of diverse perspectives in a free society.
In practice
This quote can be used in a speech about the importance of protecting minority rights in a democracy.
Our scribblings are usually not lyrics but whirrings, without colour or resonance, like the tone of an engine-wheel. I believe that the cause lies in the fact that when people write, they forget for the most part to dig deeply into themselves and to feel the whole import and truth of what they are writing.
The working classes in every country only learn to fight in the course of their struggles...Social democracy...is only the advance guard of the proletariat, a small piece of the total working masses; blood from their blood, and flesh from their flesh. Social democracy seeks and finds the ways, and particular slogans, of the workers' struggle only in the course of the development of this struggle, and gains directions for the way forward through this struggle alone.
Freedom for supporters of the government only, for members of one party only no matter how big its membership may be is no freedom at all. Freedom is always freedom for the man who thinks differently.
Social democracy seeks and finds the ways, and particular slogans, of the workers' struggle only in the course of the development of this struggle, and gains directions for the way forward through this struggle alone.
The existing legal constitution is nothing but the product of a revolution. Revolution is the act of political creation in the history of classes, while constitutional legislation is the expression of the continual political vegetation of a society.
Freedom is always and exclusively freedom for the one who thinks differently.
If one harbours anywhere in one's mind a nationalistic loyalty or hatred, certain facts, although in a sense known to be true, are inadmissible.
It seems to me there is less meanness in atheism, by a good measure. It seems that the spirit of religious self-righteousness this article deplores is precisely the spirit in which it is written. Of course he's right about many things, one of them being the destructive potency of religious self-righteousness. (p. 146)
Only a life of goodness and honesty leaves us feeling spiritually healthy and human.
I glory in the distinguishing grace of God and will not, by the grace of God, step one inch from my principles or think of adhering to the present fashionable sort of religion.
Man's free agency is not of the mind, for that is bound. There is no freedom there.
In a democracy, the majority of the citizens is capable of exercising the most cruel oppressions upon the minority.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.