What is it that keeps you so interested in the telomere? It's so intricate and complicated, and you want to know how it works.
Interpretation
The quote highlights the fascination with the complexity of telomeres and the desire to understand their function.
Elizabeth Blackburn's statement reflects the intrigue scientists feel towards telomeres, which are crucial for chromosome protection and cellular aging. Her pursuit to unravel the complexities of telomeres illustrates a broader theme in science: the motivation to explore and understand the intricate systems that govern life and health.
In practice
In a lecture on genetics, you might say, 'As Elizabeth Blackburn pointed out, what is it that keeps you so interested in the telomere?' to engage the audience.
Cancer cells have had so many other things go wrong with them, genetic, non-genetic changes, that those cells, one of the things they then get selected for is that they have lots of telomerase because now the telomeres in those cells get maintained.
We and other groups are seeing clear statistical links between telomere shortness and risk for a variety of diseases that are becoming very common, such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes and certain cancers.
Checking your telomere length is a bit like weighing yourself: you get this single number which depends on a lot of factors. Telomere length gives a sense of your underlying health.
We think there are lifestyle factors that boost telomerase naturally.
For me, arguably the story of telomeres and telomerase began thousands of years ago, in the cornfields of the Maya highlands of Central America.
If we think of our chromosomes - they carry our genetic material - as being like shoelaces, I work on the plastic tips at the end that protect them.
Economics profession, they've been - they've been confident in various formulas, but economics is not physics. The same formula that works in one decade doesn't work in the next. Economics is a difficult subject.
[Science] is corrosive of religious belief, and it's a good thing too.
The scientific value of truth is not, however, ultimate or absolute. It rests partly on practical, partly on aesthetic interests. As our ideas are gradually brought into conformity with the facts by the painful process of selection,-for intuition runs equally into truth and into error, and can settle nothing if not controlled by experience,-we gain vastly in our command over our environment. This is the fundamental value of natural science
When I wrote 'Neuromancer', I had a list in my head of all the things the future was assumed to be which it would not be in the book I was about to write. In a sense, I intended 'Neuromancer', among other things, to be a critique of all the aspects of science fiction that no longer satisfied me.
Markets have built in inefficiencies, serious inefficiencies which are well known.
Science now finds itself in paradoxical strife with society: admired but mistrusted; offering hope for the future but creating ambiguous choice; richly supported yet unable to fulfill all its promise; boasting remarkable advances but criticized for not serving more directly the goals of society.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.