As women, we get the message about how to be a good girl - how to be a good, pretty girl - from such an early age. Then, at the same time, we're told that well-behaved girls won't change the world or ever make a splash.
Phoebe Waller-BridgeRead
You don't often see a cross section of female characters interacting with each other at the top of a chain.
Interpretation
The quote highlights the rarity of significant female interactions in powerful roles.
Phoebe Waller-Bridge points out the uncommon representation of female characters who interact meaningfully with each other while holding positions of power. This observation sheds light on the need for more stories that explore the complexities of female relationships in influential contexts, emphasizing both the potential for collaboration and competition among women in high-stakes environments.
In practice
During a panel discussion about female empowerment in film, this quote could be used to highlight the importance of authentic female interactions.
As women, we get the message about how to be a good girl - how to be a good, pretty girl - from such an early age. Then, at the same time, we're told that well-behaved girls won't change the world or ever make a splash.
I think, a lot of time, I'm just writing my worst fears, of the idea of losing my mom or my best friend or doing something so terrible to somebody that's kind of deemed unforgivable or having a really broken family.
You're allowed to bore your friends and family, but to bore your audience is unforgivable.
If you hear somebody say something absolutely horrendous about their own life, in quite a flippant, offbeat kind of way, when you meet people clearly trying to be strong and brave, the ones who are really good at it are the ones who break my heart the most.
When an audience is laughing with a character, they make themselves so vulnerable, and they open up. They expose their heart the moment they're laughing, because they're relaxed and they're disarmed.
I feel liberated being around women who are liberated.
The big rule is that you must never get mixed up with a married man - never even look sideways at another woman's fella. Boy, I really was terrific at obeying that rule, wasn't I?
It was strange how your brain could know what your heart refused to accept.
...their eyes are full of kindness as each feels the full effect of novelty after a short separation. They are drawing a relaxation from each other's presence, a new serenity.
Gaining people's trust might be harder than gaining all creation. But, what is harder than gaining people's trust is having to abandon them.
Outside of the marriage context, can you think of any other rational basis, reason, for a state using sexual orientation as a factor in denying homosexuals benefits or imposing burdens on them? Is there any other rational decision-making that the government could make? Denying them a job, not granting them benefits of some sort, any other decision?
Seldom in the business and transactions of ordinary life, do we find the sympathy we want.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.