A work of art when placed in a gallery loses its charge, and becomes a portable object or surface disengaged from the outside world.
Robert SmithsonRead
The slurbs, urban sprawl, and the infinite number, of housing developments of the postwar boom have contributed to the architecture of entropy.
Interpretation
This quote reflects on the negative impact of urban expansion on the environment and societal structures.
Robert Smithson's quote critiques the uncontrolled growth of urban developments that emerged after the war, suggesting that such expansion leads to disorder and deterioration, which he calls the 'architecture of entropy.' By emphasizing the chaotic nature of human development and the resulting effects on the landscape, Smithson encourages a deeper reflection on how modern living spaces may contribute to cultural and environmental degradation.
In practice
During a talk on urban planning, one might quote this to highlight the consequences of unchecked development.
A work of art when placed in a gallery loses its charge, and becomes a portable object or surface disengaged from the outside world.
When a finished work of 20th century sculpture is placed in an 18th century garden, it is absorbed by the ideal representation of the past, thus reinforcing political and social values that are no longer with us
Instead of causing us to remember the past like the old monuments, the new monuments seem to cause us to forget the future
A vacant white room with lights is still a submission to the neutral. Works of art seen in such spaces seem to be going through a kind of esthetic convalescence.
There are such beings as vampires, some of us have evidence that they exist. Even had we not the proof of our own unhappy experience, the teachings and the records of the past give proof enough for sane peoples.
Seeing Anonymous primarily as a cybersecurity threat is like analyzing the breadth of the antiwar movement and 1960s counterculture by focusing only on the Weathermen.
When I grew up in the South, I was taught that segregation was the will of God, and the Bible was quoted to prove it. I was taught that women were by nature in inferior to men, and the Bible was quoted to prove it. I was taught that it was okay to hate other religions, and especially the Jews, and the Bible was quoted to prove it.
And what? What's the other choice? To passively let things happen and then say: "Tut-tut, what at botch that was"? Don't we all manipulate people? Even if we openly ask them to make a choice, don't we try to frame it so they'll chose as we think they should?
The notion that a radical is one who hates his country is naïve and usually idiotic. He is, more likely, one who likes his country more than the rest of us, and is thus more disturbed than the rest of us when he sees it debauched. He is not a bad citizen turning to crime; he is a good citizen driven to despair.
Pleasure, so called, is the murderer of serious thought. This is the age of excessive amusement. Everybody craves for it, like a babe for its rattle!
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.