We run the company by questions, not by answers.
Eric SchmidtRead
When the Internet publicity began, I remember being struck by how much the world was not the way we thought it was, that there was infinite variation in how people viewed the world.
Interpretation
The quote highlights the disparity between perceptions of reality and the vast diversity of perspectives revealed by the internet.
Eric Schmidt's quote reflects on the transformative impact of the internet on our understanding of the world. It suggests that the rise of online communication unveiled a myriad of perspectives and experiences, emphasizing that reality is not monolithic but rather a complex tapestry of individual views shaped by diverse backgrounds and cultures.
In practice
In a discussion about social media's impact on society, one might use this quote to illustrate the diverse opinions that emerge online.
We run the company by questions, not by answers.
For those who say you're thinking too big... be smart enough not to listen. For those who say the odds are too small ... be dumb enough to give it a shot. And for those who ask, how can you do that?... look them in the eyes and say, I'll figure it out.
The Internet is the first thing that humanity has built that humanity doesn't understand, the largest experiment in anarchy that we have ever had.
We used to think that the enterprise was the hardest customer to satisfy, but we were wrong. It turns out, consumers are harder than the enterprise because the consumer will not give you a second chance.
The characteristic of great innovators and great companies is they see a space that others do not. They don't just listen to what people tell them; they actually invent something new, something that you didn't know you needed, but the moment you see it, you say, 'I must have it.'
People who bet against the Internet, who think that somehow this change is just a generational shift, miss that it is a fundamental reorganizing of the power of the end user. The Internet brings tremendous tools to the end user, and that end user is going to use them.
Technology is a tool, and it's a platform. Nobody gets arrested for being a blogger; people get arrested for dissent. Nobody gets arrested for putting information about themselves online; they get arrested for being an activist. I'm a strong believer in the fact that you should not blame the tools; you should blame the circumstances.
Technologies of easy travel give us wings; they annihilate the toil and dust of pilgrimage; they spiritualize travel! Transition being so facile, what can be any man's inducement to tarry in one spot?
I know there's a farmer out there somewhere who never wants a PC and that's fine with me.
For me, it matters that we drive technology as an equalizing force, as an enabler for everyone around the world. Which is why I do want Google to see, push, and invest more in making sure computing is more accessible, connectivity is more accessible.
I'm struck by the insidious, computer-driven tendency to take things out of the domain of muscular activity and put them into the domain of mental activity.
There is no such thing as information overload, just bad design. If something is cluttered and/or confusing, fix your design.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.